{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiebewxmjpxxo2wrqqbw2zetpal2ivuu2i5lp5s4jzvgwwjyery2xu",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pgryn3ephfd2xgft23qokfzt/app.bsky.feed.post/3mopndenkefg2"
  },
  "path": "/t/engineering-emergence-from-prompting-to-a-new-topological-discipline/176921#post_14",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-20T09:04:47.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.huggingface.co",
  "tags": [
    "hstre.github.io",
    "DESi — Deterministic governance for LLM pipelines"
  ],
  "textContent": "Yes, that formulation captures the distinction well.\n\nI am exploring a related direction in DESi: using LLMs only where there is a genuine open solution space, while persistence, provenance, conflict handling, authority, replay, and state transitions are handled outside the model.\n\nIn that framing, PCE-like prompting remains useful, but as behavioral regulation inside the open-solution-space layer — not as the carrier of long-term epistemic continuity.\n\nReference:\n\nhstre.github.io\n\n### DESi — Deterministic governance for LLM pipelines\n\nReplay-stable. Read-only. Auditable. DESi watches LLM pipelines from the outside — and reports its own failures too.",
  "title": "Engineering Emergence: From Prompting to a New Topological Discipline?"
}