{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreibppogqk2jq6u6kaycdcflpnqzir6x4o65rt3wbruricmoicu2oii",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pgryn3ephfd2xgft23qokfzt/app.bsky.feed.post/3mo5lrfq63hr2"
  },
  "path": "/t/if-unsure-ask-never-guess-ai-agent-pre-execution-checklist/176632#post_9",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-13T05:43:32.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.huggingface.co",
  "textContent": "Some readers may raise concerns about this protocol. This document addresses them directly.\n\n**Concern 1: Isn’t having AI interpret a natural language Checklist still inference — the very thing this protocol tries to prevent?**\n\nThis document does not reject AI inference.\n\nThe problem is not inference itself.\nThe problem is executing on inference when the answer is unknown.\n\nReading a Checklist and determining what is known and what is not — that is permitted inference.\nFilling an unknown with a guess and executing — that is what this protocol stops.\n\n**Concern 2: Doesn’t requiring a Fixed Checklist contradict the flexibility of free-form JSON?**\n\nNo. They operate at different layers.\n\nThe Fixed Checklist is the minimum structure for identifying unknowns.\nFree-form JSON is how known answers are recorded and processed.\n\nThere is no conflict.\n\n**Concern 3: Who generates the questions? If AI generates them, the same problem reappears.**\n\nAI does not generate the required questions.\n\nThe Checklist is built by the parties responsible for the Action.\n\nAt minimum, the Provider and the user define the questions.\nWhere ethical, legal, or safety-critical items are involved, AI developers, organizations, or regulators may also contribute Checklist items.\n\nThis remains an open design question for the ecosystem.\n\nAI developers who have sufficient confidence in their model may also choose to reduce the scope of the Checklist.\nThe structure allows both expansion and contraction.\n\nWhat does not change is this:\n\nAI only determines which answers are already known and which are not.\nUnknown items are answered by the Provider in advance or by the user at runtime.\nFinal approval always belongs to the user.\n\n**Concern 4: How is Human in the loop guaranteed?**\n\nIt is not added as a separate mechanism.\nIt is built into the structure.\n\nC1 and C2 can only be answered by the user.\nAI cannot generate the user’s intent or execution meaning on the user’s behalf.\n\nBy following this protocol, human confirmation is structurally required before execution — not as an optional approval layer, but as a consequence of how the Checklist is designed.\n\n**Confirming intent means the human is already in the loop.**",
  "title": "If unsure, ask. Never guess. — AI Agent Pre-Execution Checklist"
}