{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreigvfwxjz5uc32f4rrcixvqz3te263o7nhu2cfsvzzumy4r654a2u4",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pgryn3ephfd2xgft23qokfzt/app.bsky.feed.post/3mo33b5yqdo62"
  },
  "path": "/t/can-an-llm-lose-conceptual-continuity-while-remaining-coherent/176469#post_13",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-12T01:22:53.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.huggingface.co",
  "textContent": "Hmm, I don’t want to cause any kind of conflict, but why do you use the When they use the word “epistemic” without apparent meaning, that usually happens when you work with AI; it’s one of their catchphrases they use to reference that type of nomenclature.That might bias their research a bit, since my topic is mainly related to inference, log-profs, logits, vectors, variance, cosines, dominance, etc. Perhaps we’re talking about It’s the same or maybe not, but using those kinds of filler words is confusing. You have to know how to present your research in a way that the public doesn’t misunderstand. That’s all I’m saying.I don’t spread hate or anything like that.",
  "title": "Can an LLM lose conceptual continuity while remaining coherent?"
}