{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreicbj3xc7abzgyupqicylbp4f6jef525bbb4g6s5ouej5awjdevwju",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pgryn3ephfd2xgft23qokfzt/app.bsky.feed.post/3mnzsyisuri62"
  },
  "path": "/t/ai-safety-in-clinical-knowledge-graph/176454#post_4",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-11T17:07:08.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.huggingface.co",
  "textContent": "Yes, there is some similarity to routing / Mixture-of-Experts, but I think the distinction is important.\n\nIn MoE, the question is usually: which expert should process this input?\n\nIn DESi-style operator selection, the question is: which method is valid for this kind of evidence?\n\nFor example, a knowledge graph needs structural dependency checks, arithmetic needs deterministic calculation, current claims need retrieval, contaminated context needs segregation, and missing required inputs should trigger clarification instead of inference.\n\nSo I would frame it less as “which expert answers?” and more as “which verification procedure is allowed before an answer may exist?”",
  "title": "AI safety in Clinical Knowledge graph"
}