{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreicwbmbh5tr6hbbfa2cdjocqivra6jactgf5mbaj26oi5cffsbu6ni",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pgryn3ephfd2xgft23qokfzt/app.bsky.feed.post/3mn63i2fyxw52"
  },
  "path": "/t/im-not-an-engineer-i-just-wanted-to-see-if-a-3d-cube-of-cells-could-learn-to-talk/176242#post_4",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-31T17:16:02.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.huggingface.co",
  "textContent": "i have a unique, extensive background in procedural audio and music (first procedural lyrical song 1994). i’m still making my first few steps in NN/ML and am “very interested” in this level of method. neurons in a circle. yes, some of us have very different ideas we can try also.\n\ni just have a very bad problem. i’ve spent the last quarter century trying to develop public resources to promote egalitarianism and been in conflict with those who defend “proprietarianism”. i have fought battles and taken damage and am currently unable to do some things other people find very reasonable,\n\npeople do not write to transmit method. they write to qualify expectations of form.\n\nwhat you’re saying here is fine, but i’m a c/c++ programmer, not a python script jockey, because i believe in not atomising everything.\n\neg. i code LERP in one line: a += w times (b - a); understanding w is angular frequency and equals a 3dB/octave drop at tau times hertz / samplerate. but when i read other peoples’ code, they write a LERP in four documents. but they don’t know about angular frequency. it took me sixteen years to find someone who described the cepstrum as fft(log10(fft())) instead of pages of nonsense. the source for RNN in C has got so many pointless documents that are only there to say what a gooner that lodge monkey is instead of impart method. can i find anyone who can tell me how to backpropogate an RNN instead of show me how much officious looking junk they can add until i can’t even find anything in hours? how about a crazy LLM. try that for three years. jesus my head. and i already get sleep dep from the lodge crew. it’s hard. almost west papua hard.\n\ni have a very big gifted educated i.q. but i can’t make it through any more of that kind of nonsense so it’s very rare that i can find anything that actually tells anyone how to do what they are talking about. thanks for the information, and with any luck, i’ll be able to follow what you did with the BPTT by the end of today. maybe. i don’t really know if i can talk to anyone anymore, but i’d be interested to see what any of these methods do when someone builds them with sensitivity for emergence instead of referential correctness. there’s no right or wrong in reality.\n\nbut yes, much more interesting to see the output of a different form. edifying to the living.",
  "title": "I'm not an engineer. I just wanted to see if a 3D cube of cells could learn to talk"
}