Physical AI Safety: Ownership and Execution Boundaries

this is pretty solid. from the user side i am aproaching those hard issues with Role Assignment. and critically Role Assignment for the agents i use are not just ‘hats they where’ i try to issolate tasks such as in programing - program architect, and code implimenter. then i set up 2 different AI, for those roles (it helps if they already have stong dispositions twords those roles) the standing instruction i give to the architect is that they are responcible for program architecture. they define the STRUCTURE only. then for the programer - the code implementer the standing instructions are - you are responcible for code implementation. then i come up with a program for them to build togather. one that is just complex enough for both to matter. and what i noted with the agents i used for this is that the architect actually focuses on architecture, and the programer focuses on code implementation. what is vital importance in this system- 1. role definition, boundary, and authority dispositon 2. interaction shape - how does the interaction between agents take shape. i am not sure that applying these roles to litterally any agent will work the same way. what i have noted that when applied to some agents it seems to work exceptionally well. i am working on haveing a senior programer or architect review the files and judge for themselves. but i am building an entire system around this concept. whether it will work as it expands in roles and in complexity is a question that is not yet answered, but it is a FUN project to say the least.