{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreigyy2eidewoxmbqzjlrdiwchrygbvjnjvkcflj2zpde4khwumshwi",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pgryn3ephfd2xgft23qokfzt/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmku2fnrqhl2"
  },
  "path": "/t/continuation-drm-transformer-from-open-geometry-to-negotiated-geometry-in-ai-alignment/176106#post_6",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-24T01:36:02.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.huggingface.co",
  "textContent": "_The comparison is interesting but it’s your hypothesis to validate, not mine. I’ve already demonstrated that emergent geometry is measurable, architecture-specific, and causally manipulable in standard Transformers. Whether DRM improves on this is for you to test. My framework will be available when the papers are out._",
  "title": "[Continuation] DRM Transformer: From Open Geometry to Negotiated Geometry in AI Alignment"
}