{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreigymq6ak4ffaixmzldqy4zitmmnwjui2b2e7zp7qwly2msms5b2hi",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pgryn3ephfd2xgft23qokfzt/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmcgqvcojqo2"
  },
  "path": "/t/prompt-engineering-the-protocol-of-intent-the-theoretical-foundation/175880#post_10",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-20T16:06:38.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.huggingface.co",
  "textContent": "I think probably a combination of approaches is the best way to goi. Most of the time the exploratory part of the request is mixed with many deterministic ones, or those that are borderline exploratory. Channelling the deterministic ones into proven execution workflows and separating them from the more exploratory ones is probably better. Also, even into the exploratory ones, you can have the need of tracking, meaning you need to undertand why the recommended selected response is produced by the model and in some cases you can also decompose it into certain parts that are more understandable for a human auditing the process. I think even in those cases using a better prompting will aid haveing more robust implementations",
  "title": "Prompt Engineering - The Protocol of Intent: The Theoretical Foundation"
}