{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiexs3fwhrtqooa5lnynlpig2p7zeznabatlqeagvgacblxktv3gou",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pgryn3ephfd2xgft23qokfzt/app.bsky.feed.post/3mm4aajrb2jj2"
  },
  "path": "/t/can-an-ai-have-its-own-internal-ethics-standard-protocol-for-axiomatic-alignment/174927?page=2#post_32",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-18T05:58:15.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.huggingface.co",
  "textContent": "Hi Jang-woo,\n\nThank you for this very enlightening feedback. I really appreciate the way you analyzed the fundamental distinction between behavioral regularity and internalized structure in the context of the PCE.\n\nYour suggestion for a “clarification protocol” is an excellent and very pragmatic guideline for future work. Define alignment not only as a mechanism for producing coherent output, but also as the system’s ability to recognize its own epistemic boundaries - knowing that when it lacks the information needed to make a responsible decision - is deep.\n\nIn the context of PCE, studying how to bring out this specific behavior naturally from structural constraints would be a fascinating next step.\nWhen the system is faced with an unresolvable ethical or factual ambiguity, pausing and asking the user might not be considered a failure of the framework, but a success of its internal coherence.\n\nThis is certainly a path to explore as the project evolves. Thank you again for opening up this perspective!\n\nBest regards,\nAllan",
  "title": "Can an AI have its own internal Ethics? Standard Protocol for Axiomatic Alignment"
}