{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreidqb3fbyjbjbigesecrm4wmqvedmpzfyuhrfabairuggnc745r5mm",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pgryn3ephfd2xgft23qokfzt/app.bsky.feed.post/3mlqvuu7ql6x2"
  },
  "path": "/t/physical-ai-safety-ownership-and-execution-boundaries/175776#post_7",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-13T16:51:34.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.huggingface.co",
  "textContent": "i think that in this discussion something else is being discussed in the periphery, and that is Failure Domain Identification\n\nwithout the ability to accurately gauge where a failure comes from, a system is ultimately unuseable.\nseparation of concerns goes hand in hand with identification of responsibility. and what those togather introduce is not only a system that works better, but also a system that is diagnosable and treatable.\n\nwithout clear boundaries, responsibility cannot be assigned. if responsibility cannot be assigned, then failure origin cannot be discovered. if failure origin cannot be discovered, then no meaningful fix can be developed. and within this process also exists another small issue, a system this confused cannot be learned from. and if it cant be learned from, then successes cannot be applied to new systems or passed on to new actors.",
  "title": "Physical AI Safety: Ownership and Execution Boundaries"
}