{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreih2ajr755nfopk36yuit55ytvh524ejc2ru4ugz4lwj53c2jh5lhm",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pgryn3ephfd2xgft23qokfzt/app.bsky.feed.post/3mlpnlwklqnu2"
  },
  "path": "/t/physical-ai-safety-ownership-and-execution-boundaries/175776#post_6",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-13T05:40:21.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.huggingface.co",
  "textContent": "**Every product comes with a user manual.**\n**But today, we give AI no manual and force it to guess.**\n\nIf the answer already exists, why rely on probabilistic guessing?\nIf you don’t know, ask.\n\n**When an accident occurs, the cause must be analyzed, and someone must bear responsibility.**\nProbabilistic guessing cannot be the basis of physical responsibility.\n\n**Manufacturers must define AI-readable manuals—structured by units of action.**\nAI must execute physical control only within the bounds of those manuals and with explicit user approval.\n\nAI’s freedom exists only within the manufacturer’s boundaries and the user’s approval.\n\nThat is the essence of ownership.\n**An entity incapable of responsibility cannot hold ownership over physical judgment.**\nAI can never own any form of physical judgment.\n\nWill we accept accidents until “guessing” becomes perfect?\nOr will we start safe control now?\n\nIf the answer exists, do not guess. **If you don’t know, ask.**",
  "title": "Physical AI Safety: Ownership and Execution Boundaries"
}