{
"$type": "site.standard.document",
"bskyPostRef": {
"cid": "bafyreidq34yjgemfxebfckyvxukd5yaqgvxmmaopmyfjpcxzoxa2q7dlje",
"uri": "at://did:plc:pgryn3ephfd2xgft23qokfzt/app.bsky.feed.post/3mlix6s52fda2"
},
"path": "/t/wan2-2-i2v-clarifications-needed-regarding-settings-on-low-vram-system/175884#post_7",
"publishedAt": "2026-05-10T13:40:13.000Z",
"site": "https://discuss.huggingface.co",
"textContent": "John6666:\n\n>\n> WanMoeKSampler:\n> boundary: 0.900\n> add_noise: enable\n> steps: 12\n> cfg_high_noise: 3.0\n> cfg_low_noise: 3.0\n> sampler_name: euler\n> scheduler: simple\n> sigma_shift: 5.0\n> start_at_step: 0\n> end_at_step: 10000\n> return_with_leftover_noise: disable\n>\n> VAE:\n> wan_2.1_vae.safetensors\n>\n> Video:\n> 33 frames\n> 512-640px long side\n> fixed seed\n>\n> Disable:\n> LoRAs\n> upscaler\n> interpolation\n> face restore\n> postprocessing\n>\n\nyup this did it. the two sd3’s were the culprits. you nailed it! its working now, no distortions, no artifacts, has better obedience and face permanence. now if i could only fix the quality part. everything has some kind of low def bloom, airbrushed, blended quality to it. this isnt just this specific setups issue. i noticed when i switched from [rapidWAN22I2VGGUF_q4KMRapidBase.gguf] to [wan2.2-i2v-rapid-aio-v10-nsfw-Q4_K.gguf] a week ago. [rapidWAN22I2VGGUF_q4KMRapidBase.gguf] basically kept true to the source image no matter what it was. even low res screengrabs. it just made whatever i fed it move. [wan2.2-i2v-rapid-aio-v10-nsfw-Q4_K.gguf] and the two low/high unets always gave me this weird dream sequence kind of bloom.\n\ni tried the\n\nA | Q3_K_M | Q3_K_M | safest low-VRAM baseline\n---|---|---|---\n\nits stable , no oom, no hick ups. im gonna move forward and test the B option. any setting changes for options A to tweak in order to squeeze more juice out of it before i move to the next step?",
"title": "Wan2.2 i2v (clarifications needed regarding settings on low vram system)"
}