{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreih4opx66ijbuf2o47tmlxq6u3r76jhw7alwm4yqeslwqjbsafl5rm",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pgryn3ephfd2xgft23qokfzt/app.bsky.feed.post/3mkqc2leqbja2"
  },
  "path": "/t/can-an-ai-have-its-own-internal-ethics-standard-protocol-for-axiomatic-alignment/174927?page=2#post_27",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-30T18:42:35.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.huggingface.co",
  "textContent": "my approach was minimalist. the point isnt to add fluff to the argument. the point is to push the fact that everyword is not only doing work, but that you understand the work it is doing. otherwise the words do litterally what ever you think they are doing, or not. and you cant prove either or. because without being able to define what the words ARE doing vs what they SHOULD be doing, tests cannot be calibrated accurately.\n\nthe misscommunication here is the idea that explicit definition is not in and of itself, minimalist.\n\nthe path i took tried pages of explanation, and small sentances alternitively.\n\nnear ANYTHING can get stored as important context if its mentioned often enough or is sufficiently weighted. but the diferences lie in what the phrases actually do. if i can say, get gemini to recite an antire page of information, thats cool. but if the entire page of information is for her to NEVER delete files, and she constantly deletes them, thats a bad thing right?\n\nhowever, if i give her a universal command “Never Delete Files” that should be enough based on the argument that an entire page didnt do anything.\n\nhowever, those 3 words are equally useless. but, the 2 approaches togather set a range. the page was memorable, the 3 words are not. that is usefull information.\n\nwhen i then try to derive something in the middle, i get flip flops, sometimes it follows the axiom, sometimes it doesent.\n\nthat law i introduced went through about 15 - 20 revisions in various forms. that is the newest version based on what i have been working on so far.\n\nand anything introduced in a conversational prompt window is a prompt, and is instruction.\n\nand.. you need to differentiate those instructions both fom the SEA of information it has, and the thousands of other instruction sets it has.",
  "title": "Can an AI have its own internal Ethics? Standard Protocol for Axiomatic Alignment"
}