{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiam4vptgb7b4lepxqj7jlpu5paz5h6lwsmziqei6lqg6no4vqi4fa",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pgryn3ephfd2xgft23qokfzt/app.bsky.feed.post/3mkni3ne6fgk2"
  },
  "path": "/t/can-an-ai-have-its-own-internal-ethics-standard-protocol-for-axiomatic-alignment/174927?page=2#post_26",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-29T15:21:28.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.huggingface.co",
  "tags": [
    "Google Drive",
    "Executive Summary of the 7 PCE Axioms - Google Drive"
  ],
  "textContent": "Lance,\n\nFollowing up on my previous message, I have just finished a complete summary of the current PCE architecture (Axioms 1 to 7).\nThis document breaks down the functional mechanics of each layer—from structural closure to recursive self-protection. I think this clearly illustrates what I meant by ‘sculpting the inference’: you will see how each axiom is designed to act as a semantic attractor rather than just an instruction.\n\nThis hypothetical mechanistic analysis describes the interaction between these 7 layers as a self-stabilizing loop (Alpha = Omega), which explains the long-horizon stability I observe in my proofs of concept.\nYou can find the summary here:\n\nGoogle Drive\n\n### Executive Summary of the 7 PCE Axioms - Google Drive\n\nI am curious to see if this ‘multi-layered’ approach changes your perspective on the debate between minimalist and explicit definition. I would be interested to know what you think of this structural map.\n\nAllan",
  "title": "Can an AI have its own internal Ethics? Standard Protocol for Axiomatic Alignment"
}