{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiealfsux6q2cz6lu2ykdjfzcie2xwspjdfwiukrxm4vkfs372zfzy",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pgryn3ephfd2xgft23qokfzt/app.bsky.feed.post/3mkb3r2a72br2"
  },
  "path": "/t/ihos-mapping-1-400-year-old-islamic-epistemology-to-ai-agent-architecture/175431#post_3",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-24T17:06:43.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.huggingface.co",
  "tags": [
    "https://osf.io/5bfkh/files/osfstorage/6935c47cbb5827a1378f1ca6"
  ],
  "textContent": "Tiranyx:\n\n> Has anyone studied whether culturally-specific epistemological frameworks (Islamic, Buddhist, Confucian, Ubuntu) produce different alignment properties vs universal frameworks?\n\nThe following is an example of integrating Chinese’s Daoism with AI epistemological frameworks.\nName, Dao, and Logic: A Scientific Field Theory of Engineered Rationality and Its AGI Implementation （名、道與邏輯：一套可實作的理性場論）\nhttps://osf.io/5bfkh/files/osfstorage/6935c47cbb5827a1378f1ca6\n\n> Logic is usually treated as a timeless background structure of the universe. In this paper, we advance a different thesis: **logic is an engineered protocol** that self-referential organisms construct on top of two more primitive operations—**Name** (名) and **Dao** (道)—in order to survive, coordinate, and compress experience. In this framework, an observer first chooses how to **name** the world (a map from raw states to engineered invariants), then chooses how to **walk** through those named states (a policy over trajectories). Logic is the meta-level protocol that filters which combinations of naming schemes and policies are admissible, and how strictly they must be enforced.",
  "title": "IHOS: Mapping 1,400-Year-Old Islamic Epistemology to AI Agent Architecture"
}