{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreicn6va4wogfvlpecdribphxf4duj5xlckmq5xrxhr4pzj7mqodshi",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pgryn3ephfd2xgft23qokfzt/app.bsky.feed.post/3mjszeumq5ab2"
  },
  "path": "/t/yggdrasil-memory-model/175356#post_5",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-19T01:35:00.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.huggingface.co",
  "textContent": "Interesting idea. I’d separate philosophy from the actual model though.\n\nYMM doesn’t require information to exist as its own field it just assumes information is carried and shaped by a structure. In this case, a graph that updates through use. The “living” aspect comes from reinforcement and reorganization, not from information being independent of a substrate.\n\nSo I’d frame it more as information = pattern + structure + reinforcement over time.\n\nThat said, if you did think of information as a field, the activation flow idea maps pretty naturally onto it, it’s just not something the model depends on to function, if u catch my drift",
  "title": "Yggdrasil Memory Model"
}