A Bidirectional LLM Firewall: Next Level X1 - help wanted!

This is a thoughtful response — thank you. I found the distinction between the finding itself and the standing of the finding especially useful. What I’m taking from it into my own architecture work is the idea that extracted material may need to carry more than content. It may also need to carry its scope, authority level, decision role, and transfer stability so that local or advisory signals do not quietly harden into governing ones when they move across layers or contexts. That part feels very relevant to the continuity / migration problems I’ve been thinking about in my own systems. Your distinction between an escalation trigger and an actual policy basis also stood out to me. That seems like one of the easiest places for architectural confusion to creep in if the system preserves that something fired, but not what kind of work that signal is actually allowed to do. One follow-up question I’d be curious about: At what point in the pipeline do you think that status card becomes mandatory? My instinct is that if those distinctions only become explicit late in the system, some of the most important boundary confusion has already happened upstream. Thanks again — this gave me something real to think with. Tiger