{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiejg6sufqyvbvgpdvhrgkp4tjj6buzoxmdtxbflyy7xilobysm6w4",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pgryn3ephfd2xgft23qokfzt/app.bsky.feed.post/3mjexmfqhfzl2"
  },
  "path": "/t/ai-ethics-is-everywhere-execution-models-are-nowhere-so-i-built-one/175193#post_3",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-13T13:09:52.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.huggingface.co",
  "tags": [
    "432 — A Journey Experience",
    "AI Systems Have No Hunger"
  ],
  "textContent": "Interesting framing, but I’d push back gently: every GPT, every Gemini Gem, every GPT made with pre-prompting, every character in my own HF Space (432 — A Journey Experience) already runs on a “boundary layer” — it’s just written in prose instead of JSON. The shape of the container doesn’t change the hard part.\n\nThe hard part isn’t declaring constraints. It’s getting a stochastic model to _honor_ them. Prose or JSON, you’re still asking an LLM to interpret “no_water” semantically and comply. That’s not an execution layer, it’s a system prompt with curly braces.\n\nThe deeper move, I think, is mechanism over declaration: constraints that are _self-enforcing_ because violating them costs the agent something. That’s what I’ve been exploring here → AI Systems Have No Hunger. The farmer doesn’t need a `NotStartIf: no_seed_reserve` rule — next winter’s hunger is the rule.\n\nDeontic boundaries are fragile. Metabolic ones aren’t.",
  "title": "AI ethics is everywhere. Execution models are nowhere. So I built one"
}