{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreier7rzesumb7puvjgvjcpojel7p7mpwyt2k6lnlt6myrnov4ky4jy",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pgryn3ephfd2xgft23qokfzt/app.bsky.feed.post/3mipaitk7tdl2"
  },
  "path": "/t/an-integrated-engineering-grade-guidance-on-agent-archtecture/174926#post_2",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-04T17:41:56.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.huggingface.co",
  "textContent": "hmm.\ni like your presentation on ‘just add another agent’\nin my own workflow, i utilize several agents. some have specific reasons for being included.\nand i have observed soemthing you have all but stated implicitly. Roles must be DEFINED and FRAMED in a multi-Agent workflow. it is not enough to give them ‘Role names’ an name is just a name, it is not always a concept.\nso for a ‘role’ to have any meaning, it must be defined, and therfor a framework derived. Much like asking an actor to present themselfs as a historical figure… without knowledge of the figure in question, they are acting in name only.\n\nand the incrememntal Incrementation Path -\nsmaller elements - more clarity. combining smaller elements = structural Clarity. basically, starting small alows one to adequitely define each state. this alows you to test outputs at each stage. if the state is too large, then failiers are not easily traceable. but if the state is derifed from smaller - well defined states, then the failier is earier to trace, and thus re-alignment is easier.\n\ni feel like there is a universal law hiding here, along the lines of starting small with incremental steps.\n\nbut i offer these inputs only as observations.\nthe images here are doing A LOT of work. and there is alot to take in.",
  "title": "An Integrated, Engineering-Grade Guidance on Agent Archtecture"
}