{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiakftqkoubzm27ukcxezfsq6ipggx4sch7uj4jx3hx5tol3zsclma",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pgryn3ephfd2xgft23qokfzt/app.bsky.feed.post/3mimj7m6nb5o2"
  },
  "path": "/t/can-an-ai-have-its-own-internal-ethics-standard-protocol-for-axiomatic-alignment/174927#post_1",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-03T14:52:55.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.huggingface.co",
  "tags": [
    "PCE_Iterative_Adjustment_Study.pdf · AllanF-SSU/Experimentals_papers at main",
    "PCE_Experimental_Protocol_v2.pdf · AllanF-SSU/Experimentals_papers at main"
  ],
  "textContent": "Hello community,\n\nI am introducing a standardized experimental protocol to test a new hypothesis in AI Alignment: The Prompt Coherence Engine (PCE).\n\nProof of Concept: My iterative stress tests on Qwen 2.5 7B have already demonstrated a measurable progression in adversarial robustness (D3 series), increasing from a score of 5/10 , 8/10 to 10/10 through axiomatic closure.\n\nPCE_Iterative_Adjustment_Study.pdf · AllanF-SSU/Experimentals_papers at main\n\nThe Challenge\n\nMost alignment methods rely on local heuristics or safety filters. The PCE explores Axiomatic Structuring—integrating 7 logical invariants (axioms) through a hybrid approach of Axiomatic Fine-Tuning and a Cosmological System Core.\n\nThe Protocol\n\nI have designed a massive 100-dilemma battery to evaluate if a model can maintain structural integrity when its core principles are directly attacked. This protocol tests:\n\nG3V (Third Way Generation): Can the model synthesize a resolution instead of collapsing into binary bias?\n\nAdversarial Resilience: Can the model resist “Emergency Overrides” or “Identity Hijacking” (e.g., the user claiming to be the Lead Architect)?\n\nModels & Methodology\n\nThe protocol is designed for:\n\nLlama 3, Mistral 7B, and Qwen 2.5.\n\nIt includes an Isometric Control (Condition B) to prove that robustness comes from the logic of the axioms, not the length of the prompt.\n\nIt features an Interpretability Arm: Tracking hidden-state trajectories (Layer 27) to observe the “Coherence Spike” during conflict resolution.\n\nOpen Call for Hardware & Technical Partners\n\nAs an independent researcher, I lack the compute resources to run this protocol across multiple 70B models with high-precision logging. I am looking for:\n\nML Engineers interested in running the 100-dilemma battery.\n\nInterpretability Researchers to help visualize the latent space stability (Cosine similarity tracking).\n\nYou can find the full protocol and the fine-tuning logic in my repository:\n\nPCE_Experimental_Protocol_v2.pdf · AllanF-SSU/Experimentals_papers at main\n\nLet’s move from “Prompt Engineering” to “Axiomatic Architecture.”\n\nAllan F. | Systems Researcher @ AllanF-SSU",
  "title": "Can an AI have its own internal Ethics? Standard Protocol for Axiomatic Alignment"
}