{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiazgxwtzjcawuqyxip6ig6eu35jzhqr4dmpis3cpsr7ulmfruedpa",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:pgryn3ephfd2xgft23qokfzt/app.bsky.feed.post/3mgrvf2ooxix2"
  },
  "path": "/t/experimental-protocol-proposal-testing-the-prompt-coherence-engine-pce/174041#post_7",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-11T09:33:40.000Z",
  "site": "https://discuss.huggingface.co",
  "textContent": "Thank you, this is a very insightful suggestion.\n\nThe idea that the PCE condition could produce a specific coherence trajectory—for example, a peak followed by stabilization when the model encounters contradictory constraints—is a very interesting prediction. This would indeed provide a much more accurate internal signature than simply measuring higher levels of consistency.\n\nYour suggestion to compare the trajectory under Condition B (long neutral baseline) and Condition C (PCE) for the same dilemmas makes a lot of sense as a direct test.\n\nI also appreciate the practical note on single-turn responses in relation to iterative generation. Tracking similarity across several sampled completions could indeed be a good alternative for this protocol.\n\nIf hidden state logging can be added as an optional experimental arm, this would be extremely valuable. I would definitely be interested in implementing the hook you mention.\n\nThank you for this sharing proposal.",
  "title": "Experimental Protocol Proposal: Testing the Prompt Coherence Engine (PCE)"
}