{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreih5itcgfahdrfrc2pdzl6xppskk3m464ixemuzsfxqidrzeknxqei",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:p3227y2hdjlcc64d55t4c5y4/app.bsky.feed.post/3mlw3eslhzhh2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreif5c7zna5dxk2bzaxgkuldlga4bk72rsa35ygvioeo5zglbxmwu2a"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 66793
  },
  "path": "/2026/05/15/the-surprising-divide-over-what-counts-as-true/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-15T18:40:53.000Z",
  "site": "https://reason.com",
  "tags": [
    "Cognitive Science",
    "Politics",
    "Confirmation bias",
    "Psychology/Psychiatry",
    "Research",
    "Truth"
  ],
  "textContent": "A new study finds that what people think about facts, authenticity, or coherent beliefs explains why they disagree about what is true.",
  "title": "The Surprising Divide Over What Counts as True"
}