{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreie6om2z55zhfb7ukmox773nbsxxl6twudcij3lgkz46x7alr6sgvi",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:p3227y2hdjlcc64d55t4c5y4/app.bsky.feed.post/3miwiynutox62"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreicomiz3nh7izyifkkviscochuanflhqld6bqy4lzfp5gj42wrgsqi"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/png",
    "size": 1243163
  },
  "path": "/2026/04/07/why-scotus-ruled-8-1-against-colorados-conversion-therapy-ban/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-07T11:00:36.000Z",
  "site": "https://reason.com",
  "tags": [
    "Free Speech",
    "Law & Government",
    "Constitution",
    "First Amendment",
    "Supreme Court"
  ],
  "textContent": "Understanding the Supreme Court’s decision in Chiles v. Salazar.",
  "title": "Why SCOTUS Ruled 8–1 Against Colorado's 'Conversion Therapy' Ban"
}