{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreigap3qyjxe5skyebkla44zbeaaodukltmjyidg5qwy6uhjzfaih34",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:p3227y2hdjlcc64d55t4c5y4/app.bsky.feed.post/3mggtbpkuo4t2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreicnoaejkpry42c7e24sn7vz7flq6dcm2vg6ct4ztwvsgltzqh6g4u"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/png",
    "size": 1958326
  },
  "path": "/2026/03/06/why-j-d-vance-is-a-risky-bet-for-republicans-in-2028/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-06T17:41:41.000Z",
  "site": "https://reason.com",
  "tags": [
    "Campaigns/Elections",
    "Politics",
    "War",
    "Donald Trump",
    "Iran",
    "J.D. Vance",
    "Republican Party",
    "Trump Administration"
  ],
  "textContent": "Vance's support for unpopular policies could spell trouble for the GOP in 2028. But this could be a good thing for the party's future, says Jonah Goldberg.",
  "title": "Why J.D. Vance Is a Risky Bet for Republicans in 2028"
}