{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreidmldtpa2tsmcu6kht3au7ghpzgmakdkpoaye4rbyrwkscybrpkre",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:p3227y2hdjlcc64d55t4c5y4/app.bsky.feed.post/3mfr35synynb2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreiepa7iw6tlj3h4da2yi46wiykam4cwaeold7bzjiolbb25k3fgwze"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 223185
  },
  "path": "/volokh/2026/02/25/thoughts-on-the-supreme-court-oral-argument-in-the-pung-v-isabella-county-takings-case/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-02-26T03:36:54.000Z",
  "site": "https://reason.com",
  "tags": [
    "Housing Policy",
    "Takings",
    "Fifth Amendment",
    "Property Rights"
  ],
  "textContent": "A house is seen with $100 bills falling behind it",
  "title": "Thoughts on the Supreme Court Oral Argument in the Pung v. Isabella County Takings Case"
}