{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreibagsg4tgrdysa32paldd2squv45zvjyl7yfb56wdzwcqqlbehpk4",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:oznbnvgr7dmvddiyvr7dih52/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmzmv4fwnkr2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreiejdlaruosxpcmeskbtlemwx3cwbmpqohpm425yvfwff6pfycv3oe"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 329923
  },
  "path": "/sport/tennis/french-open-adolfo-daniel-vallejo-sexist-row-comments",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-29T21:28:08.000Z",
  "site": "https://www.gbnews.com",
  "tags": [
    "Jose Mourinho signs as new Real Madrid manager on three-year deal",
    "French Open player sparks controversy after saying woman should not have umpired match",
    "Chelsea loanee set for huge return after being ousted from side",
    "The GB News Editorial Charter"
  ],
  "textContent": "\n\n\nAdolfo Daniel Vallejo will face a \"significant\" financial penalty from French Open organisers following what they described as \"unacceptable\" and \"sexist\" remarks directed at a female match official.\n\nThe 22-year-old, currently ranked 71st in the world, targeted Brazilian umpire Ana Carvalho after suffering defeat in his second-round encounter on Thursday.\n\n###\n\n\n\n\nVallejo claimed the match should have been officiated by a male umpire, arguing women lack the necessary \"courage\" to manage difficult crowds.\n\nTournament officials moved swiftly to condemn his comments, with the French Tennis Federation stating it \"strongly condemns all sexist remarks\".\n\n###\n\n\n\n\nTRENDING\n\nStories\n\nVideos\n\nYour Say\n\n###\n\n\n\n\nThe contest on Court Suzanne-Lenglen lasted nearly five hours, with 17-year-old home favourite Moise Kouame eventually prevailing 6-3, 7-5, 2-6, 2-6, 7-6 (10-8) against the Paraguayan.\n\nVallejo took issue with Carvalho's handling of the atmosphere, describing the crowd as \"annoying\" and \"disrespectful\".\n\nHe also expressed frustration with the time his opponent was allowed between points.\n\nUnder tournament regulations, players must serve within 25 seconds, though officials retain discretion over when to activate the shot clock, particularly when waiting for spectators to settle.\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n### LATEST SPORTS NEWS\n\n\n\n\n  * Jose Mourinho signs as new Real Madrid manager on three-year deal\n  * French Open player sparks controversy after saying woman should not have umpired match\n  * Chelsea loanee set for huge return after being ousted from side\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\nSpeaking to Clay magazine, Vallejo said: \"I think these sort of matches should be umpired by a man.\n\n\"It's very difficult for a woman to do it because the crowd is very annoying, and you need to have a lot of courage to go against the crowd.\"\n\nWhen pressed on whether a male official would have altered the outcome, he responded: \"Yes, yes, absolutely.\n\n\"The crowd was really disrespectful, but I understand it because they are supporting their home player.\"\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\nThe world number 71 later posted on X, defending himself, insisting his remarks had been \"taken out of context\" and were directed specifically at Carvalho rather than female umpires generally.\n\nThe French Tennis Federation issued a robust response, saying \"the competence of an umpire is not determined by their gender, but by their professionalism and ability to officiate at the highest level\".\n\nOfficials added \"the outcome of a sporting event, whether positive or negative, can never justify or excuse such remarks\".\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\nThe tournament expressed its support for Carvalho and all officiating staff.\n\nUnder Grand Slam regulations governing unsportsmanlike conduct, Vallejo faces a potential fine of up to $100,000 (£74,200).\n\nThe rulebook stipulates players must conduct themselves appropriately at all times, showing proper respect for officials, opponents and spectators alike.\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n**Our Standards: The GB News Editorial Charter**",
  "title": "French Open player who sparked sexism row to face 'significant' fine for 'unacceptable' comments"
}