{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreifgsyksemhm3xfq6uxcjfabtqajjjzna5ggbwzkfczmoczckf2bca",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:oznbnvgr7dmvddiyvr7dih52/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmgrd3sns2a2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreifhwr7b7knq3bebou2yevmkzeb5xpn2vgu5o4iv7cjfi3d3iydpky"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 632116
  },
  "path": "/royal/andrew-mountbatten-windsor-freedom-city-of-london-royal-news",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-22T10:30:20.000Z",
  "site": "https://www.gbnews.com",
  "tags": [
    "The GB News Editorial Charter"
  ],
  "textContent": "\n\n\nThe City of London Corporation has formally censured Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor after he declined to voluntarily relinquish his freedom of the City honour.\n\nThe governing body of the Square Mile passed the motion of censure on Thursday, expressing what it described as \"profound disappointment\" that the former prince had \"not surrendered his freedom despite being asked to do so\".\n\n###\n\n\n\n\nThe court of common council deemed his ties to convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein \"wholly unacceptable and inconsistent\" with the responsibilities expected of a freeman.\n\nMr Mountbatten-Windsor failed to respond to correspondence from the corporation requesting he give up the honour.\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\nTRENDING\n\nStories\n\nVideos\n\nYour Say\n\nThe corporation's highest decision-making body acknowledged it currently lacks the authority to strip Mr Mountbatten-Windsor of the distinction because it was inherited rather than awarded.\n\nHe obtained the freedom in 2012 through patrimony, having received it automatically as the son of Prince Philip, who held the honour.\n\nA review conducted in March confirmed the corporation could not revoke the hereditary title through existing mechanisms.\n\nHowever, the court has now directed officials to begin proceedings that would enable the lawful removal of his freeman status.\n\nThis represents a significant step toward finding a legal pathway to strip him of the ancient honour.\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\nIn its full motion, the court stated: \"The court of Common Council notes with the utmost dismay Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor's association with the convicted paedophile, the late Jeffrey Epstein, and his accomplice, Ghislaine Maxwell.\"\n\nThe motion continued: \"Whilst it recognises that Mr Mountbatten-Windsor maintains that he has done nothing wrong, it nevertheless considers that his well-publicised association with Epstein is wholly unacceptable and inconsistent with his status and obligations as a freeman of the City of London.\"\n\nThe court expressed its desire to remove the honour \"in solidarity with Epstein's victims and survivors\", aligning with previous decisions by the King and other military and civil bodies to strip him of offices and honours.\n\nThe corporation emphasised that its thoughts \"remain firmly with the victims and survivors of Jeffrey Epstein and all victims of sexual abuse and exploitation\".\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\nMr Mountbatten-Windsor is not the only figure to face such consequences over Epstein connections.\n\nIn March, Sarah Ferguson was stripped of her honorary freedom of the City of York due to her links to the convicted paedophile.\n\nThe freedom of the City of London ranks among the capital's most ancient traditions, with its origins believed to date back to 1237.\n\nThe honour historically permitted recipients to conduct their trade within the Square Mile.\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n**Our Standards: The GB News Editorial Charter**",
  "title": "Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor censured for failing to surrender his freedom of the City of London"
}