{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreibje4k2ey3hmuutot4rq2tw5kzguix2ntpx4fqskpbviib4aibcmy",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:oznbnvgr7dmvddiyvr7dih52/app.bsky.feed.post/3mls7uz7muad2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreibonpl3x47eyuawpvs2yjwakparhabiasi7jvg4pcsomku67a3rmm"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 4280038
  },
  "path": "/news/trans-row-london-hampstead-heath-privacy-upgrades-swimmers",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-14T06:36:16.000Z",
  "site": "https://www.gbnews.com",
  "tags": [
    "Muslim NHS worker could secure £25k payout after trans women allowed into single-sex toilets",
    "American school 'ignored complaints about trans student leering at girls in female changing room",
    "SNP slammed for ‘frittering away’ more than £1.5m of taxpayers’ cash on defending trans ideology",
    "The GB News Editorial Charter"
  ],
  "textContent": "\n\n\nHampstead Heath will spend £1million on \"privacy\" upgrades after granting trans swimmers access to women's ponds.\n\nThe Ladies' Pond will remain \"trans inclusive\", City of London Corporation councillors have ruled, despite the landmark Supreme Court decision that the term \"woman\" refers to biological sex.\n\n###\n\n\n\n\nThe gaggle of councillors admitted the pond's rules only aligned with the previous interpretation of the Equality Act 2010 and had been in operation since 2017.\n\nThey have given the green light to keep access as it currently operates - allowing both trans women and biological women to swim there.\n\n###\n\n\n\n\nTRENDING\n\nStories\n\nVideos\n\nYour Say\n\n###\n\n\n\n\nCouncillors said they would review the current policies in place in light of the Supreme Court judgement, running a consultation which received more than 38,000 responses.\n\nBut, after around 13 per cent saying they wished for the Men's and Ladies' to become single-sex spaces, committee members elected to keep the space \"trans inclusive\".\n\nTo appease women who want privacy, the committee members decided to splash £1million to improve changing, showering and toilet facilities instead of enforcing the judicial decision.\n\nThe committee's executive director of environment Katie Stewart said the upgrades would allow those wanting to change privately could do so.\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\nBack in March, the gender critics Sex Matters secured permission from the Court of Appeal to pursue its legal battle against the group over trans access to the bathing ponds.\n\nMrs Justice Lieven had previously blocked the judicial review in January, ruling that the county court was the \"appropriate forum\" rather than the High Court.\n\nSex Matters subsequently sought appeal permission, contending the judge had erred in law.\n\n### LATEST TRANS ROWS:\n\n\n\n\n  * Muslim NHS worker could secure £25k payout after trans women allowed into single-sex toilets\n  * American school 'ignored complaints about trans student leering at girls in female changing room\n  * SNP slammed for ‘frittering away’ more than £1.5m of taxpayers’ cash on defending trans ideology\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n**Our Standards: The GB News Editorial Charter**",
  "title": "Hampstead Heath spends £1m on 'privacy' upgrades after letting trans swimmers in women's pond"
}