{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreieg3iftgug3diupszo7fkpgfkvqpcqb2v3cgpzbbncw5ftgjucxry",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:oznbnvgr7dmvddiyvr7dih52/app.bsky.feed.post/3mkoelappuio2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreidjukoovg5pwccm2y4qffcdrioegynlgbzxfheyvckefsosmypn7e"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 157071
  },
  "path": "/news/us/united-airlines-flight-drone-san-diego-international-airport",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-29T21:57:56.000Z",
  "site": "https://www.gbnews.com",
  "tags": [
    "Jet2 demands national database for disruptive passengers so yobs can be banned from every airline",
    "Jet2 flight forced into emergency landing in Manchester after collision with geese",
    "Easyjet refused to postpone stag do flights after groom's daughter was diagnosed with brain tumour",
    "The GB News Editorial Charter"
  ],
  "textContent": "\n\n\nA United Airlines flight reportedly struck a \"shiny, red\" drone, though the Boeing 737 landed safely.\n\nThe incident occurred whilst descending towards San Diego International Airport on Wednesday morning.\n\n###\n\n\n\n\nFlight 1980, carrying 48 passengers and six crew members, had departed San Francisco just before 7am local time before the mid-air encounter occurred over the Californian city.\n\nThe airline confirmed: \"United flight 1980 reported a possible drone strike just prior to arriving in San Diego.\"\n\n###\n\n\n\n\nTRENDING\n\nStories\n\nVideos\n\nYour Say\n\n###\n\n\n\n\nThe carrier added: \"The flight landed safely, and customers deplaned normally at the gate. Our maintenance team found no damage after thoroughly inspecting the aircraft.\"\n\nNo injuries were reported following the incident.\n\nAudio captured via the ATC app and subsequently shared on social media revealed the exchange between the pilot and dispatcher following the encounter.\n\n\"We hit a drone. At around, probably, at around 3000ft, about,\" the pilot reported after landing.\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\nWhen asked by the dispatcher to describe the object's approximate size or characteristics, the pilot responded: \"It was so small, I couldn't tell. It was red. It was shiny.\"\n\nThe Federal Aviation Administration provided a slightly different account of the altitude, stating that the crew \"believed they saw a drone 1,000 feet below them\" whilst the aircraft was at approximately 4,000ft.\n\nAir traffic control subsequently warned other pilots in the vicinity, though no further drone sightings were reported.\n\nUnder FAA regulations, drone operators are prohibited from flying their aircraft above 400ft altitude without obtaining specific authorisation.\n\n### LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:\n\n\n\n\n  * Jet2 demands national database for disruptive passengers so yobs can be banned from every airline\n  * Jet2 flight forced into emergency landing in Manchester after collision with geese\n  * Easyjet refused to postpone stag do flights after groom's daughter was diagnosed with brain tumour\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\nAdditionally, pilots must avoid restricted airspace, including zones around airports.\n\nThe incident has prompted considerable discussion online, with users questioning how the unmanned device managed to reach such a high altitude.\n\nOne X user commented: \"No off-the-shelf consumer drone can get to 3000 ft. I'll be very interested to see how this investigation plays out.\"\n\nThe mystery surrounding the object's origin and capabilities remains unresolved, with standard consumer drones typically incapable of reaching the altitude reported by the United Airlines crew.\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\nWhile direct collisions between commercial aircraft and drones remain relatively uncommon, reported incidents have risen in recent years.\n\nAnalysis found that drones accounted for nearly two-thirds of reported near-midair collisions involving passenger planes during takeoff and landing at America's 30 busiest airports in 2024.\n\nThe San Diego incident marks the second notable event involving United Airlines in California within recent weeks.\n\nLast month, Flight UA 2127 was forced to make an emergency return to Los Angeles International Airport following reported engine difficulties, with passengers evacuating via emergency slides after smoke filled the cabin.\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n**\n**\n\n**\n**\n\n**Our Standards: The GB News Editorial Charter**",
  "title": "United Airlines flight collides with 'shiny, red' drone on approach to airport"
}