External Publication
Visit Post

Keir Starmer on verge of FULL Chagos Islands U-turn after losing Donald Trump support

Home: Latest & breaking News | GB News [Unofficial] April 10, 2026
Source

Sir Keir Starmer has been compelled to abandon his controversial Chagos Islands sovereignty agreement following President Trump's decision to withdraw American backing, describing the proposal as "an act of great stupidity."

The legislation underpinning the transfer of the islands to Mauritius will be absent from next month's King's Speech, according to reports from The Times.

This reversal would constitute the Prime Minister's 16th significant policy U-turn since taking office.

While Downing Street maintains its commitment to the agreement and intends to seek a change of heart from the US President, officials have conceded that proceeding without Washington's endorsement is impossible.

TRENDING

Stories

Videos

Your Say

Trump had originally endorsed the arrangement following detailed negotiations between intelligence services from both nations, however he reversed course amid tensions with Nato concerning his ambitions for Greenland.

Under the proposed arrangement, Britain would have ceded sovereignty of the archipelago to Mauritius while simultaneously securing a 99-year lease for the Diego Garcia base, which has played a role during the Iran conflict.

Although the financial implications of the deal became a point of sharp disagreement between the two main parties.

Ministers maintained the total cost would reach £3.5 billion, whilst Conservative critics insisted the true figure over the agreement's lifetime would amount to £35 billion.

The Prime Minister had staked considerable political capital on pushing through the controversial agreement, despite fierce resistance from both the Tories and Reform UK.

Opponents had cautioned that proceeding would violate a 1966 Anglo-American treaty affirming British sovereignty over the islands and guaranteeing their availability for mutual defence purposes.

A government source defended the administration's position, stating: "Diego Garcia is a critical strategic asset for both the UK and the United States and securing its longterm operational future is the sole purpose of this deal."

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

  • Britain to host crunch talks with 41 nations in bid to unblock Strait of Hormuz
  • Keir Starmer gets some luck in the Middle East - but it may not help him - Christopher Hope
  • Nigel Farage agrees Donald Trump must ‘take some blame’ for economic impact of Iran war

The source added: "We continue to believe the agreement is the best way to protect the long-term future of the base. But we have always been clear that we would only proceed with US support."

Officials blamed delays within the American system for leaving insufficient parliamentary time to complete the necessary steps this session, describing the situation as "deeply frustrating following years of intensive engagement".

Relations between Sir Keir and Mr Trump have soured considerably throughout the Iran conflict.

The American president was put out when Britain refused permission for US forces to launch initial strikes from British bases, accusing Starmer of weakness and declaring he was "no Winston Churchill".

This week, the Prime Minister remarked that the public are "fed up" with both Mr Trump and President Putin driving up living costs.

Conservative leader Kemi Badenoch claimed credit for the deal's apparent collapse, declaring: "If Keir Starmer's Chagos surrender deal now finds its rightful place on the ash heap of history, it will be because the Conservatives led the fight against it from day one."

Reform leader Nigel Farage also personally lobbied senior Trump administration figures to oppose the agreement during his discussions with them.

Ministers now fear Mauritius may pursue legal action through the International Tribunal on the Law of the Sea.

They believe any "provisional measures" could grant Mauritius temporary access to waters surrounding Diego Garcia, potentially hampering nuclear submarine operations and naval patrols.

Our Standards: The GB News Editorial Charter

Discussion in the ATmosphere

Loading comments...