{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreieyjkebbwzyvznfljrmvce4w6vprqvyl47gtardjbhjsbicnl24wy",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:oznbnvgr7dmvddiyvr7dih52/app.bsky.feed.post/3mgdmdzmyipd2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreidro6udt4s6hafvg4zlh2uy4b5jfibb5y3gu5zxsbi736zzh4ox6a"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 81799
  },
  "path": "/lifestyle/cars/croydon-council-ltns-high-court",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-05T18:42:01.000Z",
  "site": "https://www.gbnews.com",
  "tags": [
    "Nissan warns 'Sunderland car factory could close' amid 'existential threat' from EU",
    "Car insurance giants reject claims self-driving vehicles will dominate UK roads",
    "Driving law changes could install devices in cars amid 'significant evidence' and rising support",
    "The GB News Editorial Charter"
  ],
  "textContent": "\n\n\nThe High Court has ruled that six low-traffic neighbourhoods operated by a London council were unlawful.\n\nCroydon Council's primary motivation was generating revenue from motorists rather than reducing pollution or enhancing road safety, the court ruled.\n\n###\n\n\n\n\nMr Justice Pepperall delivered his judgment on Thursday, finding that the financially troubled council had exercised its powers for an \"improper purpose\" when it made the LTN schemes permanent in 2024.\n\nThe judge quashed the orders establishing the traffic restrictions, concluding that safeguarding income from enforcement cameras was the council's \"dominant purpose\" in retaining them.\n\n###\n\n\n\n\nTRENDING\n\nStories\n\nVideos\n\nYour Say\n\n###\n\n\n\n\nThis decision could force the authority to dismantle all six schemes and potentially reimburse millions of pounds to drivers who received fines for entering the restricted zones.\n\nThe ruling challenges the typical justifications councils provide for implementing LTNs, which are generally promoted as measures to cut emissions and encourage active travel.\n\nJason Perry, the Conservative Mayor of Croydon, had publicly opposed the LTNs whilst serving in opposition.\n\nHowever, Mr Perry chose not to scrap them after taking office, citing the severe financial pressures facing the borough.\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\nThe council has effectively declared bankruptcy three times over the past five years, leaving it with limited room for manoeuvre on revenue-generating measures.\n\nIn his judgment, Mr Justice Pepperall pointed to the mayor's lukewarm public support for the health and safety arguments underpinning the schemes, combined with his repeated statements about being constrained by budgetary concerns.\n\nThe judge stated: \"Taking the relatively modest benefits of the schemes into account together with the mayor's apparent lack of public enthusiasm for the road safety or health case for these schemes and his clear and repeated comments before and after the vote as to his hands being tied by the budgetary considerations, I am satisfied on the balance of probabilities that the dominant purpose for these orders making the schemes permanent was the need to safeguard the revenue raised by enforcement.\"\n\nThe six LTNs were first established during the pandemic in 2020 before being made permanent at the start of 2024.\n\n### LATEST DEVELOPMENTS\n\n\n\n\n  * Nissan warns 'Sunderland car factory could close' amid 'existential threat' from EU\n  * Car insurance giants reject claims self-driving vehicles will dominate UK roads\n  * Driving law changes could install devices in cars amid 'significant evidence' and rising support\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\nAutomatic number-plate recognition cameras monitored the restricted areas, with drivers who breached the rules receiving penalty charge notices of £160.\n\nHowever, the penalty is reduced to £80 if settled within a fortnight.\n\nThe enforcement operation proved exceptionally profitable for the cash-strapped authority.\n\nFreedom of Information data revealed that fines totalling £1.4million were issued in just one month.\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\nThe council's own projections anticipated the schemes would bring in more than £10million across four years.\n\nHowever, cash-strapped Croydon has also proposed a net expenditure budget of £485.4million for the 2026-27 financial year.\n\nThe court dismissed the council's arguments that its decision-making had followed proper statutory procedures, finding instead that the authority had acted unlawfully in prioritising financial considerations over the stated aims of the traffic restrictions.\n\nOpen Our Roads, a campaign group pushing for the removal of LTNs, welcomed the judgment and called on Croydon to immediately halt enforcement, take down all six schemes and create a mechanism for refunding penalised motorists.\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n###\n\n\n\n\nThe organisation stated: \"Today's judgment confirms that local authorities must act lawfully and for the purposes parliament intended. Residents deserve transparency and decisions based on evidence, not financial necessity.\"\n\nCampaigners suggested the ruling should put other councils on notice when considering similar traffic measures.\n\nLondon has witnessed multiple legal battles over LTNs in recent years.\n\nThe High Court found Lambeth council's West Dulwich scheme unlawful last year after the authority failed to adequately consider residents' objections.\n\nA separate challenge concerning Tower Hamlets council's LTNs is expected to reach the Supreme Court.\n\nGB News understands Croydon Council is considering its position.\n\n###\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n**Our Standards:The GB News Editorial Charter **",
  "title": "Cash-strapped council illegally created six LTNs to pocket millions of pounds from motorists"
}