{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreicvxfc2lfesqakd7jaz7oe2tlq3dw4gfxbsq7nrxc3wensxfti7ye",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:oz6bd3nroehodsehaws5n57d/app.bsky.feed.post/3miaw2hdu6xw2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreid4mn7jk6se3b3c4xconeklcjddtnjv52bu2jeyqjgi442y5hcx5a"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/png",
    "size": 104171
  },
  "path": "/please-we-beg-just-one-weekend-free-of-appliances-citrix-netscaler-cve-2026-3055-memory-overread-part-2/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-29T20:07:28.000Z",
  "site": "https://labs.watchtowr.com",
  "tags": [
    "analysis from Part 1"
  ],
  "textContent": "Today, we woke up with a nagging feeling: what if Citrix had, in fact, patched multiple Memory Overread vulnerabilities as part of CVE-2026-3055?\n\nWhile we've been using our analysis from Part 1 (please read it first, as this post will be brief) to accurately identify exploitable Citrix NetScaler",
  "title": "Please, We Beg, Just One Weekend Free Of Appliances (Citrix NetScaler CVE-2026-3055 Memory Overread Part 2)"
}