{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreigsly2v2k6t7fqkl7ji2jn5ivutq3bovj2elwmzmpijhgmpoarnne",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:ornsbtmaufp6dx4zecjdtoon/app.bsky.feed.post/3mp666p3euga2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreigab6jq7isvk7xlu65qjl3vsgw77mdgy4spd6ds5rpqyw3tovrefa"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 78378
  },
  "path": "/post/27072059",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-25T16:35:13.000Z",
  "site": "https://beehaw.org",
  "tags": [
    "U.S. News",
    "Powderhorn",
    "usnews",
    "0 comments",
    "https://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jun/25/monsanto-supreme-court-pesticide-case"
  ],
  "textContent": "submitted by Powderhorn to usnews\n10 points | 0 comments\nhttps://www.theguardian.com/business/2026/jun/25/monsanto-supreme-court-pesticide-case\n\n> The US supreme court has found in favor of the former Monsanto company in a ruling that is expected to block thousands of lawsuits filed by people alleging the key ingredient in the weed killer Roundup causes cancer.\n>\n> The decision was made in a 7-2 vote, with Justice Brett Kavanaugh offering the majority opinion and justice Ketanji Brown Jackson writing the dissenting opinion, joined by justice Neil Gorsuch.\n>\n> The case, Monsanto v Durnell, specifically dealt with the question of whether a federal law that gives the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulatory authority over pesticides preempts state claims that a company failed to warn users of certain product risks when the EPA itself has not required such warnings.",
  "title": "US supreme court blocks thousands of lawsuits over Roundup maker’s pesticide warning labels"
}