{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreihfoq77iymeagqzn3ihsuxulhh5i3qtyg6vnpawziv22i3p7m2qya",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:oiokqdfjz4ivqojfpkojv6sy/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmtjge66sy22"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreig6fn5mctxo7xrpnnqvyhpn76tnszgdtduypf34n7t5iorbrg63ku"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/png",
    "size": 24547
  },
  "description": "In today's PG&E-focused briefing:\n\n * Parties submit reply briefs in the CPUC's Rule 30 docket;\n * A new PD denies PG&E's request to exclude approximately $2.6 billion in wildfire liabilities and a state loan from its capital structure calculations; and\n * A proposed settlement resolves all disputed issues in PG&E's 2024 ERRA compliance proceeding.",
  "path": "/pg-e-update-data-center-cost-shift-fight-capital-structure-denial/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-27T12:35:22.000Z",
  "site": "https://www.calregulatory.com",
  "tags": [
    "2024 ERRA compliance",
    "Subscribe now"
  ],
  "textContent": "In today's PG&E-focused briefing:\n\n  * Parties submit reply briefs in the CPUC's Rule 30 docket;\n  * A new PD denies PG&E's request to exclude approximately**$2.6 billion** in wildfire liabilities and a state loan from its capital structure calculations; and\n  * A proposed settlement resolves all disputed issues in PG&E's 2024 ERRA compliance proceeding.\n\n\n\n* * *\n\n### This post is for subscribers only\n\nBecome a member to get access to all content\n\nSubscribe now",
  "title": "PG&E Update: Rule 30 Cost-Shift Fight, Capital Structure Denial",
  "updatedAt": "2026-06-01T04:33:05.913Z"
}