{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreigtf4vahrzfab7uk24isrdbfd22een6dag7b4546yw4ju3gtlmivu",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:o7x3aaueo7gbdj5s6ywwl7sl/app.bsky.feed.post/3mjw3gr5g4kd2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreifo6ntuxbwmnpzab76mbk325qlfgk3gdg6nagengznsn4efq2mc7q"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/webp",
    "size": 87442
  },
  "path": "/silverco-cusi-mine-pea-bigger-isnt-always-better/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=silverco-cusi-mine-pea-bigger-isnt-always-better",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-19T15:34:00.000Z",
  "site": "https://thedeepdive.ca",
  "tags": [
    "Full Analysis",
    "Latest",
    "Resources",
    "Video Series",
    "Silverco Mining",
    "Silverco Cusi Mine PEA: Bigger Isn’t Always Better",
    "the deep dive"
  ],
  "textContent": "Most mining stories are about giant projects, huge capital bills, and long waits for production. This one’s different. Silverco Mining’s (TSXV: SICO) new PEA outlines a much smaller silver restart at the past-producing Cusi Mine in Mexico, with low upfront capital, a sub-one-year payback at base case pricing, and a timeline that could see production […]\n\nThe post Silverco Cusi Mine PEA: Bigger Isn’t Always Better appeared first on the deep dive.",
  "title": "Silverco Cusi Mine PEA: Bigger Isn’t Always Better"
}