{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreicts3rqt3oz34dpnzfc2auufb4m6kunkbcqplaezvotshuuqsomj4",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:npppinc2x6on5fmrcemn2p5o/app.bsky.feed.post/3moedu7jrxrt2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreidzpmgbx75bv4u7b75etftoe65u7fqbyp5fvyig5ex4tfnathy554"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 404049
  },
  "path": "/post/819512065301626880",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-15T18:20:08.000Z",
  "site": "https://tumblr.sztupy.hu",
  "tags": [
    "mostlysignssomeportents",
    "https://pluralistic.net/2026/06/15/vernacular/#hypercardian",
    "https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374621568/thereversecentaursguidetolifeafterai/",
    "https://www.instructables.com/CARDIAC-CARDboard-Illustrative-Aid-to-Computation-/",
    "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rewired:_The_Post-Cyberpunk_Anthology",
    "https://pluralistic.net/2026/03/17/technopolitics/#original-sin",
    "Keep reading"
  ],
  "textContent": "mostlysignssomeportents:\n\n> ALT\n>\n> **If you’d like an essay-formatted version of this post to read or share, here’s a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:**\n>\n> **https://pluralistic.net/2026/06/15/vernacular/#hypercardian**\n>\n> Over the weekend, I did an interview about my forthcoming book _The Reverse Centaur’s Guide to Life After AI_ (a book about being a better AI critic), and the interviewer said she was surprised that I wasn’t an AI booster, based on my demographics and work history:\n>\n> https://us.macmillan.com/books/9780374621568/thereversecentaursguidetolifeafterai/\n>\n> I could see where she was coming from. I encountered computers in the mid-seventies, as a small child. My first computer was a CARDIAC, a working, Turing-complete, mechanical computer made entirely of cardboard, that I spent endless hours with:\n>\n> https://www.instructables.com/CARDIAC-CARDboard-Illustrative-Aid-to-Computation-/\n>\n> Then I graduated to a teletype terminal and acoustic coupler connected to a minicomputer at the University of Toronto. My mom, a kindergarten teacher, used to smuggle home 1,000’ rolls of paper towel from the kids’ bathroom. I’d get 1,000’ feet of computing up one side, then another 1,000’ down the other side, then I’d carefully re-roll the paper towel so she could put it back in the bathroom for the kids to dry their hands on.\n>\n> After that, I got an Apple ][+ in 1979, and shortly thereafter acquired a modem, and that was it: I was hooked for life. I became an amateur programmer, then a professional programmer. I hosted forums on dial-up BBSes where I distributed software and offered support to strangers who wanted to connect their computers to the internet. I got a job as a gopher developer, then a web developer, then a CIO-for-hire, helping wire up small businesses and connect them to the net. Eventually, I co-founded a free/open source software startup, before transitioning to 25 years as a digital rights activist with the Electronic Frontier Foundation. And for most of that time, I was energetically writing science fiction, eventually becoming associated with a school sometimes called “post-cyberpunk”:\n>\n> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rewired:_The_Post-Cyberpunk_Anthology\n>\n> The force that energized all this work was a dialectical one, the contradiction that powered cyberpunk literature itself. For all that cyberpunk was undeniably enamored with the coolness and combustibility of new technology, it was also terrified of how technology could be a force for oppression, surveillance and control. As William Gibson says, “cyberpunk was a warning, not a suggestion.”\n>\n> Gibson’s more famous quote, of course, is “the street finds its own use for things.” In Gibson’s novels (and in my own life in technology) all the most interesting things happen when users of technology (often without formal training or credentials) find ways to adapt the technology they use to suit their needs:\n>\n> https://pluralistic.net/2026/03/17/technopolitics/#original-sin\n>\n> This is why I remain an ardent fan of Hypercard, Scratch and other meta-tools that are designed to allow non-programmers to write software that exactly conforms to their desires. Whatever the apps produced by these tools lack in sophistication and efficiency is more than offset by the fact that they give everyday people the power to directly control the tools they rely upon.\n>\n> If “epistemic humility” means anything, it means acknowledging that no amount of “requirements gathering” can capture the needs of people totally unlike yourself as faithfully as those users can capture their own needs. Giving people the tools to produce their own software is always going to make tools – vernacular, idiosyncratic, homespun – that are more suited to their own hands and minds than anything a technologist working on their behalf could make.\n>\n> Keep reading",
  "title": "AI and amateurism"
}