{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreigbsx2yesi2opzw5akzoiopd3wxtw6zf2vs6o2wozrmmw2iw7hpze",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:ni5eohohmlxqayqdhebpppzv/app.bsky.feed.post/3mllrfawu3rh2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreieep7zgw6zrzc7f62gmhlzlptpe2p56ozon3mmay7y5a6filuezae"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 33424
  },
  "path": "/esa-e3-california-law-stop-killing-games",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-11T15:39:19.000Z",
  "site": "https://www.eurogamer.net",
  "tags": [
    "First person",
    "Ivory Tower",
    "Third person",
    "Single Player",
    "Stop Killing Games",
    "Racing",
    "Ubisoft",
    "The Crew",
    "PC",
    "Xbox 360",
    "MMORPG",
    "PS4",
    "Ubisoft Reflections",
    "Multiplayer Competitive",
    "Ubisoft Entertainment",
    "Asobo Studio",
    "Action Adventure",
    "Xbox One",
    "Entertainment Software Association",
    "Multiplayer Cooperative",
    "Californian consumer protection law AB 1921",
    "Read more"
  ],
  "textContent": "The proposed Californian consumer protection law AB 1921, a digital game-focused law which would ensure either offline versions of games or refunds at end-of-service would be available, is causing some arguments in the industry.\n\nRead more",
  "title": "\"The industry wants people to think this is a demand for eternal server support ... it isn't\" - E3 owner and Stop Killing Games clash over Californian games bill"
}