{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreies7f5xajlve3lyaivnxgkx4zyctisyzsxtxzjpnxiuu6ksrcyiwa",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:ni5eohohmlxqayqdhebpppzv/app.bsky.feed.post/3mg5re3zlxjp2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreidl6p3mmefuwkcxab4ldh6zta77uid3ftlw44qyfmsobxwuzk7rvu"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 45451
  },
  "path": "/for-better-or-worse-pokemon-firered-and-leafgreens-switch-ports-arent-exactly-as-we-remember-them-but-is-that-a-problem",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-03T11:00:00.000Z",
  "site": "https://www.eurogamer.net",
  "tags": [
    "RPG",
    "Single Player",
    "Action Adventure",
    "Bird view / Isometric",
    "Pokémon FireRed and LeafGreen",
    "Pokémon FireRed/LeafGreen",
    "for £16.99 _each_",
    "Read more"
  ],
  "textContent": "Over the weekend, the fog around Nintendo's unexpected (and, in some ways, controversial) rerelease of Pokémon FireRed/LeafGreen has lifted, and it's all left me feeling rather peculiar. When Nintendo first announced these ports, released via the Nintendo eShop where they retail for £16.99 _each_, there was a lot of community outcry. Previously, we'd seen Game Boy Advance titles added to the Nintendo Classics catalogue, accessible via a paid Nintendo Switch Online + Expansion Pack membership. A bit cheeky, fine, but for those that wanted to partake in some retro goodness, it's always been an indulgent bonus.\n\nRead more",
  "title": "For better or worse, Pokemon FireRed and LeafGreen's Switch ports aren't exactly as we remember them - but is that a problem?"
}