{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreifgi55525xcix4ag6bszfegpa2jfwho7hiko23lnpce7zn5t3dnty",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:neopp5z3zbi24mwiena7tt7j/app.bsky.feed.post/3mmbbnhzkg3z2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreibhc56bgxdu2jeyz27xpj3w4kwbombjx2ldv6fftvhp7fx75gzdh4"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 10705
  },
  "path": "/2026/05/a-symposium-on-constitutional.html",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-20T04:30:00.000Z",
  "site": "https://legalhistoryblog.blogspot.com",
  "tags": [
    "a symposium issue"
  ],
  "textContent": "_Texas A &M Law Review_ 13:2 (2026) is a symposium issue on constitutional interpretation with many contributions of interest to legal historians:\n\nConstitutional Interpretation as Problem Solving: How the Modalities Work\nJack M. Balkin\n\nOriginalist Arguments in Free Speech History\nSamantha Barbas\n\nRace, Memory, and Authority in Constitutional Interpretation\nHenry L. Chambers, Jr.\n\nMemory Warriors, Pluralists, and Abnegators in Constitutional Interpretation: An Essay on Jack Balkin's Pluralist Originalism in Memory and Authority\nJed Handelsman Shugerman and Zachary Shugerman Handelsman\n\nBalkin Amid Balkanization: Constitutional Construction, the Uses of History, and Interpretive Discretion in a Divided Country\nNeil S. Siegel\n\nMemory and Authority of Failed Constitutional Amendments\nJulie C. Suk\n\nHistorical Methods of Constitutional Interpretation and Political Gradations\nNelson Tebbe\n\nRoger Taney, Memory Entrepreneur\nAnne Twitty\n\nHermeneutics in History\nJohn Fabian Witt\n\nRemarks: Why Constitutional Argument Matters\nPhilip Bobbitt\n\n--Dan Ernst",
  "title": "A Symposium on Constitutional Interpretation",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-20T04:30:00.115Z"
}