{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreihg2grcbztsxomgw2y4nnizhi7day6e5rjqpbn36dud4tpfu2mvkm",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:n345d6t2uj5zx327rkuvc76x/app.bsky.feed.post/3mgmssqmmfmk2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreiao7iooijjf43wzb7ylbyvmpd2h7flfh2ujks2ygxgpdj6xaitxha"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 157684
  },
  "description": "Abundant energy and intelligence are arriving just as the culture demands simplicity. The brand that sells \"enough\" will own the biggest business opportunity in history.",
  "path": "/more-joy-less-work/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-09T12:03:33.000Z",
  "site": "https://www.circudyne.com",
  "tags": [
    "punks",
    "Bill McKibben reports",
    "Bill Nussey frames it like this",
    "People are building replicas of Thoreau's cabin across America",
    "Swiss communities are designing 2,000-watt neighborhoods where people work less, share more, and report higher satisfaction",
    "In Los Angeles, the 50L Home coalition retrofitted thirty-one households with water-efficient fixtures and appliances",
    "Clay Christensen",
    "Steve Jobs",
    "Lee Clow",
    "everything a brand does is media",
    "after loss, after failure, after the long work of understanding what actually mattered to him",
    "induction cooktop",
    "Circular business models are the only economics where \"buy less\" is a growth strategy",
    "Subscribe now"
  ],
  "textContent": "What you crave tells you what you lack.\n\nThe courts of Versailles craved splendor. Their lives were cold, violent, and short. Splendor was the fantasy, the escape, the thing that couldn't be had cheaply. So they gilded everything.\n\nMidcentury American men craved rugged independence. They were accountants and middle managers and insurance adjusters from the suburbs. So they watched John Wayne westerns on Saturday nights and felt, for two hours, like men who answered to no one.\n\n_We_ crave simplicity.\n\nWhy? Because we are drowning. The noise has become absurd. The feed refreshes and the options multiply and the inbox fills and the subscription renews and the notification pings and the algorithm suggests and somewhere underneath all of it is a person who just wanted to read a book tonight.\n\nThere is a market signal here. A big one. And most brands are ignoring it.\n\n## The Counterculture Already Knows\n\nLast week I described an emergent counterculture that doesn't look like the last one. Today’s punks are repairing their dishwasher. Growing food. Choosing quality over quantity. Opting out of systems that treat them as inputs.\n\nThis week, we name the rebellion’s objective.\n\nThey want _enough._\n\nThat word does more work than it appears to. \"Enough\" is not \"less.\" It is the precise amount that satisfies without burdening. A well-made meal for four people. A home that fits. A tool that lasts. Enough is what you arrive at when you subtract everything that exists to serve someone else's business model instead of your life.\n\nThe rebellion has an advantage: \"enough\" is closer at hand than at any point in human history.\n\nAnd the need for it is more urgent than ever.\n\n## Two Arcs, One Moment\n\n### The first arc: abundance is arriving.\n\nThis is the _new_ abundance — not more stuff, more options, or more noise. Instead, a structural shift.\n\n**Energy** is becoming a technology rather than a resource. Bill McKibben reports that a gigawatt of solar capacity — roughly one coal plant's worth — is now installed every fifteen hours. In Pakistan, ninety-five percent of farmland in some regions has switched to solar, and a set of photovoltaic panels is now routinely included in a bride's dowry. The fuel cost, the biggest line item in a farmer's budget, is simply gone.\n\n**Intelligence** is following the same curve. It will become infrastructure, the way electricity did — invisible, ambient, available.\n\nBill Nussey frames it like this: abundance happens when you convert a resource into a technology. That conversion is happening to energy right now, and to intelligence right behind it.\n\n### The second arc: the culture of intentional constraint is ascendant.\n\nPeople are building replicas of Thoreau's cabin across America. Swiss communities are designing 2,000-watt neighborhoods where people work less, share more, and report higher satisfaction. In Los Angeles, the 50L Home coalition retrofitted thirty-one households with water-efficient fixtures and appliances. Nobody was asked to take shorter showers. Nobody changed their routine. Water and energy use dropped dramatically.\n\nSatisfaction went _up_. Some participants said they now take pleasure in chores they used to resent. In the 2,000-watt neighborhoods, the curated sharing of resources deepened civic participation and turned neighbors into friends.\n\nMost observers see these two arcs as contradictory. Abundance on one side. Constraint on the other.\n\nThey are not contradictory. They are complementary. But their intersection benefits from creative management.\n\n## The Treadmill Has Reached the Point of Absurdity\n\nHere is what stands between those two arcs and their natural convergence: the hedonic treadmill.\n\nYou know the treadmill. You get the raise. You feel good for a little while. Then the new baseline sets in and you need the next raise. You buy the bigger house. It feels spacious for a little while. Then it feels normal and you need the renovation. The psychologists have documented this phenomenon for decades. Satisfaction from acquisition is temporary. The desire for more is permanent.\n\nThe industrial economy didn't just tolerate the treadmill. It _required_ it. Planned obsolescence was the fuel for the process. And the bait.\n\nThe factory needed output. Managers couldn't measure quality from across the floor, but they could spot idleness. So activity became the proxy for productivity, and then the proxy for virtue, and then the proxy for a life well lived. You can't see flourishing with your eyes, but you can see busyness. We optimized for the thing we could see and called it success.\n\nThat error is now playing out at civilizational scale. We measure GDP — output — because it's easier to measure than joy. And then we mistake the metric for the goal.\n\nThe treadmill was _always_ a bad deal. But it was an understandable one when material scarcity was acute. Today the treadmill has reached the point of self-parody. Algorithmic feeds sell you solutions to problems the previous algorithm created. Subscription tiers multiply to capture every marginal dollar of willingness to pay.\n\nThe McMansion stands as the architectural expression of the treadmill: more square footage, more complexity, more cost, less taste, less coherence, less peace. It is everything that Thoreau's cabin was not.\n\nAnd here is the thing about Thoreau's cabin, or Chōmei's ten-foot hut: they are _implicitly tasteful_ in the way that things built with clear purpose are. The absence of excess _is_ the design. A McMansion has no such clarity. It is a style of building that doesn't know what it's for, expressed in architectural language it doesn't understand. The treadmill built it, and the treadmill is the only reason anyone would live in it.\n\n## The Jevons Trap\n\nJevons paradox is the most reliable pattern in resource economics: when you make something more efficient, people use more of it. Coal. Bandwidth. Attention. The rebound effect has held for a hundred and sixty years.\n\nClay Christensen put it like this: we husband what’s scarce, and squander what’s plentiful.\n\nIf energy becomes essentially free through renewables, and intelligence becomes essentially free through AI, Jevons predicts we will squander both. More energy means more consumption. More intelligence means more optimization of extraction. The abundance that could liberate us from the treadmill could just as easily accelerate it.\n\nIn other words: McMansions of energy and intelligence.\n\nThe simplicity advocates can't solve this alone. Thoreau went to the woods by himself. The monks formed communities of the deeply committed. The Swiss 2,000-watt neighborhoods require an infrastructure of civic consensus that doesn't travel. Individual willpower doesn't scale.\n\nHuman nature never changes. Right?\n\nJevons paradox is just that: a paradox, not a law.\n\nWe have broken supposedly immutable links before. The most powerful human drive met the most elaborate governance system in history — thousands of years of religious, legal, and cultural architecture, all built on the assumption that the consequences of sex were inseparable from the act. And then a small pharmaceutical advance decoupled them in a generation. Nobody's nature changed. The system changed, and behavior followed. All at once.\n\nIncipient advances in energy and intelligence will decouple the link between efficiency and excess the same way. And circularity will enable the business models that thrive in that new set of circumstances.\n\nWhen materials cycle instead of deplete, when energy regenerates instead of exhausts, the drive for _more_ doesn't produce the consequence of _less_.\n\nYou don't change human nature. You design a system where that nature stops causing damage.\n\nBut technology alone is not enough. It needs fashioning into a compelling solution. Design, marketing, packaging, and organization all need to fit the new purpose. That’s what Steve Jobs did for computing.\n\nAs Lee Clow, Steve Jobs’ advertising partner, understood: everything a brand does is media. The technology of circularity needs to be brought to life for people — or it remains an abstraction.\n\n## The Privilege We Won't Take\n\nWe accept longer, healthier lives as a gift.\n\nNo one argues that modern medicine is an affront to the character-building virtues of dying young. No one insists that antibiotics make us soft. The compounding advances in healthcare are a privilege of living in this era, and we receive them gratefully.\n\nSo why do we treat the hedonic treadmill as though stepping off it were a moral failure? Why do we treat overwork as dedication, overconsumption as ambition, and burnout as the price of seriousness?\n\nIndustrial-era programming. Nothing more.\n\nChōmei arrived at his ten-foot hut through years of philosophical reflection — after loss, after failure, after the long work of understanding what actually mattered to him. Thoreau went to Walden with the intellectual preparation of the entire Transcendentalist movement behind him. The path _to_ the insight was hard. But the destination they found — a life of intentional sufficiency, rich in beauty and quiet and thought — was materially modest even by the standards of their own centuries.\n\nToday, the path of philosophy is harder than ever. Information overload makes sustained self-examination feel impossible. The noise floor has risen so high that the Socratic conversation — the one that helps you discover what you actually want — can barely be heard.\n\n🏷️\n\nConstraint is the price of joy. It always has been. But that tradeoff has never been more favorable.\n\nBut the destination Chōmei and Thoreau reached? That has never been easier to build.\n\nImagine the ten-foot hut with photovoltaic panels and a heat pump. Imagine Walden with an induction cooktop and an e-bike. Imagine the monk's cell with a view of the stars _and_ a complete library of every civilization's accumulated knowledge, accessible from a device that fits in your hand.\n\nThe material infrastructure for the intentional life is better, cheaper, and more available than at any point in history. The cost of stepping off the treadmill has never been lower. The cost of staying on has never been higher.\n\nConstraint is the price of joy. It always has been. But that tradeoff has never been more favorable.\n\n## Provisions for the Journey\n\nThe philosophical path to the intentional life is harder. The material path is easier. The desire is there — the counterculture of repair and restraint and quality is already growing. And the coming abundance of energy and intelligence could fund the transition beautifully, if it's directed toward making the simple life _better_ rather than making the complex life _more_.\n\nBut the object of this desire doesn't sell itself. The greatest upgrade in history — more joy, less work, more beauty, less noise — has no sales force. The entire commercial apparatus is optimized to keep people on the treadmill. Every ad, every feed, every notification exists to sell _more._ Stepping off is anti-revenue by every conventional measure.\n\nExcept one.\n\nCircular business models are the only economics where \"buy less\" is a growth strategy. When your revenue comes from ongoing service rather than unit sales, you _want_ fewer, more durable products in the field. When your design targets satisfaction rather than replacement, you _want_ customers to stop shopping. When your materials cycle rather than deplete, selling less means wasting less means earning more per unit of matter.\n\nThis is the mediating institution between abundant resources and constrained living. Not government — governments have been captured, and they move too slowly. Not individuals alone — the philosophical path is too hard without support, and willpower doesn't scale:\n\nBrands.\n\nBrands that build the provisions for people who have already chosen the path — or who would choose it if someone made it accessible. Brands that embed the restraint into the product so the customer doesn't have to exercise willpower. The 50L Home participants didn't decide to use less water. The engineering decided for them, and they were happier.\n\nFewer things. More durable. More beautiful. Serving needs higher on the pyramid of human aspiration. Earning more by making less. This is not austerity. It is the most sophisticated form of value creation available.\n\nThe ascending counterculture — the quiet punks of repair and intention and enough — already know what they want. They are the new Chōmei. The new Thoreau. They need provisions.\n\n💎\n\nThis is not austerity. It is the most sophisticated form of value creation available.\n\nThe brand that provides them will own the largest commercial opportunity in history. Not because it's easy. Because it's hard, and the difficulty is the moat.\n\n* * *\n\n_On the Bubble is a Circudyne Letter series taking stock of the macro transition to circularity.__Subscribe_ _to follow the full series._\n\n* * *\n\n### This post is for subscribers only\n\nBecome a member to get access to all content\n\nSubscribe now",
  "title": "More Joy, Less Work",
  "updatedAt": "2026-03-09T12:03:33.106Z"
}