{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreidroblvqmwtdv6rnzcr2jehooxnvxu4xi5onrbzmk6o7ckkvhispe",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:n345d6t2uj5zx327rkuvc76x/app.bsky.feed.post/3mg3cuurxtel2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreickoxrhttfizx6htlqguthn6g2qummdgj2ru4j6aa62yh2lrqw6ju"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 209716
  },
  "description": "When institutions produce the chaos, order becomes the rebellion. The punks of 2026 don't sneer. They say \"no thank you\" and build something without you.",
  "path": "/20260109-are-you-a-punk/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-02T13:03:09.000Z",
  "site": "https://www.circudyne.com",
  "tags": [
    "Dunkirk",
    "Douglas Holt",
    "_On the Bubble_",
    "_Leadership in the Time of Enshittification_",
    "_The Supply Mirage_",
    "supply-side",
    "_Empathy Is a Strategic Capacity_",
    "empathy",
    "disruptive innovation",
    "_Dunkirk Spirit and Circular Transformation_",
    "_Maintenance Is a First Principle_",
    "Stewart Brand",
    "_Transformative Ends, Incremental Means?_",
    "Zeno's Paradox",
    "what does it look like on the other side",
    "Subscribe now"
  ],
  "textContent": "**Rebellion is afoot. But not where you think.**\n\n  * Have you noticed a shift?\n  * Look around. Who is producing the chaos now?\n  * The polarity has flipped\n  * Same defiance. New world.\n  * Operation Dynamo: a bunch of punks\n  * A lesson for brands that care\n  * You can only cross over to a counterculture you can _see_.\n  * The rebels are out there.\n  * Practitioner Insights\n\n\n\n## Have you noticed a shift?\n\nFor fifty years, the word \"punk\" meant chaos. It meant smashing things. Tearing things up. Refusing the rules. This made perfect sense, because for fifty years, the big institutions — the corporations, the governments, the systems people depended on — were the ones imposing order. Sometimes helpful order. Sometimes suffocating order. But order.\n\nThe deal was clear. Accept our terms. Wear the suit. Buy the product. Stay in your lane. In return, we'll give you stability.\n\nAnd the rebels said: no. They ripped their jeans. They smashed guitars on stage. They made noise and mess and art out of refusal. Chaos was the weapon, because order was the cage.\n\nThat world is gone.\n\n## Look around. Who is producing the chaos now?\n\nYour candy bar is not chocolate anymore. Confectioners quietly swapped the cocoa butter for vegetable fat and changed the label from \"milk chocolate\" to \"chocolatey candy.\" They are betting you won't read the wrapper. That is one way to manage costs. It is also contempt.\n\nYour subscription costs more than it did last year and does less. Your phone is slower than it was before the update. Your airline seat is smaller than it was a decade ago. The product that lasted ten years now lasts two, and everyone in the boardroom knows it, and they shipped it anyway.\n\n🖕\n\nThey are telling you — in every language except plain English — to go to hell.\n\nThe power grid fails when it's hot. It fails when it's cold. The utility sends you a bigger bill either way. The platform that was useful three years ago is an advertising swamp today. The government makes a decision on Tuesday and reverses it on Thursday, and millions of people rearrange their lives both times.\n\nNone of this comes with a warning. It comes with a label change you're meant not to read. A press release about \"delivering enhanced value.\" A quarterly earnings call that celebrates the margin improvement without mentioning what was taken from whom.\n\nThe private equity operator who buys a beloved company and strips it for parts calls it \"value creation.\" The food scientist who replaces your chocolate with wax calls it \"recipe optimization.\" The government that levies a tax on a whim. They are telling you — in every language except plain English — to go to hell.\n\n🌀\n\nThe institutions are not imposing order anymore. They are producing entropy. __They__ are the mess.\n\nThe contempt is in the business casual. The chaos is in the suit.\n\nThe institutions are not imposing order anymore. They are producing entropy. _They_ are the mess.\n\n## The polarity has flipped\n\nIf the institutions (brands, the government) are dumping chaos from above, then the rebellion has no choice but to percolate order from below.\n\nYou want to know what a punk looks like in 2026?\n\nThe neighbor on her knees in the garden at 6 AM, coffee going cold on the fence post. The guy at the hardware store asking about replacement parts for a fifteen-year-old dishwasher. The family with the compost bin and the cast iron pan and the boots that have been re-soled twice.\n\nThe woman who sharpens her kitchen knives instead of buying new ones. The kid who learned to solder from a YouTube video and fixed his own headphones. The couple who cancelled three subscriptions last month and didn't miss any of them.\n\nThey don't look like punks. They are unassuming. They look boring. They look — and here is the important thing — _orderly_.\n\nCables labeled. Garden beds measured. Meals planned from what's in them. Things maintained instead of replaced. Systems designed to last, in a world where nothing is designed to last.\n\nThat's why you can't see them.\n\nIf you suspect counterculture is having a moment, you’re right. But if you're scanning for the smashed guitar and the ripped jeans and the mohawk, you’re going to miss it. You're expecting the counterculture to look like chaos, because the last time, it did.\n\nBut the last time, the establishment was orderly. This time, the establishment is the mess. So the rebellion changed its medium.\n\nThe punk of 1977 smashed a guitar to refuse the bargain.\n\nThe punk of 2026 labels a cable run to replace it.\n\n## Same defiance. New world.\n\nThe punk of 1977 was impossible to ignore. That was the whole point. The screamed lyrics, the torn clothes, the sneer — it was all _signal_. Loud signal. The establishment could see the rebellion coming. They could study it. React to it. Co-opt it. Market to it. Even fight it, if they wanted to lose slowly.\n\nToday's punk is polite.\n\nToday's punk doesn't boycott your product. A boycott is a gift — it tells you something is wrong and gives you a chance to fix it. But today's punk just leaves. No letter. No tweet. No dramatic exit. They stop buying the candy bar. Not because they read an article about compound coatings — though some did — but because it stopped tasting right and they'd rather make something from scratch.\n\nThey cancel the subscription. They repair the appliance. They walk away from your brand quietly, politely, resolutely — and they don't tell you why.\n\nThis is the part the instruments can't handle.\n\nEvery demand model ever built works like a metal detector. It scans the ground for signals — clicks, conversions, intent data. It finds pockets of demand you can mine. Deposits you can squeeze harder. It is very good at finding what's there.\n\nIt cannot find what walked away.\n\nThe conscious non-consumer is economic dark matter. They don't emit a signal. They don't reflect your ad spend back to you. They don't register in your funnel because they've left. You only sense their presence by the growth that should be there that isn't. The galaxy should be expanding. Something invisible is holding it back.\n\nYour dashboards say everything is fine. Your KPIs are green. But the numbers are soft, and nobody in the room can explain why, because the people who left didn't slam the door.\n\nBain estimates conscious non-consumers could be as much as 32% of the U.S. market.\n\nThey aren’t coming.\n\nBut they are taking names.\n\n## Operation Dynamo: a bunch of punks\n\nIn May of 1940, the British Army was trapped on the beach at Dunkirk.\n\nThe Royal Navy had destroyers. Big, powerful ships — built for exactly this kind of crisis. But the destroyers drew too much water. Their armor, their guns, their institutional heft — the very things that made them formidable in deep ocean — made it impossible to reach the beaches. The Navy didn't send them and fail. They couldn't send them at all. The institution looked at the problem, looked at its own capabilities, and was helpless.\n\nSo the small boats went instead. Fishing boats. Pleasure craft. Ferries. Little boats with shallow draft, piloted by civilians who had no military training and no grand strategy.\n\n> The captains of the Little Ships were punks.\n\nWhen institutions fail, that’s who shows up. And show up they did. Organized, orderly, and brave, they went into the space the institution couldn't reach. They had no armor. They didn't need it. They had presence, and purpose, and a willingness to sail into the gap.\n\nThey built a rescue out of what they had. And they saved 338,000 lives.\n\n## A lesson for brands that care\n\nWe’ve discussed the work of Douglas Holt and his theory about how brands become icons — not big brands, or merely successful brands, but _iconic_ brands, the ones that define an era and outlive it.\n\nHis conclusion is simple.\n\nThey side with the counterculture. Every time. Not every countercultural brand is iconic, but every iconic brand has at one point or another enabled the cause of rebellion.\n\nConsider Levi Strauss. Blue jeans were workwear. Tough pants for laborers and miners. The bohemians of the 1950s and the rebels of the 1960s adopted them precisely because jeans were the opposite of the gray flannel suit — the uniform of the institutional order they were rejecting. Levi's didn't invent the counterculture. The counterculture picked Levi's off the shelf.\n\nLevi Strauss & Co. had the sense to see what was happening and lean into it instead of running from it. They crossed over. They sided with the rebellion. And they became the most iconic brand in their segment of the twentieth century. Volkswagen did the same. As did Harley-Davidson.\n\nThat's how it always works. The brand doesn't create the rebellion. The rebellion adopts the brand, and the brand has a choice. Cross over, or get left behind.\n\nHere is something to think about: can you name a single brand — one — that became iconic by fighting the counterculture of its moment?\n\nI can't either.\n\nWhen has that ever been a winning strategy? The brands that clung to the old order in every previous cultural shift are either forgotten or became business school cautionary tales. The winners saw the energy, recognized the shift, and crossed over.\n\n## You can only cross over to a counterculture you can _see_.\n\nAnd you won’t see it if you’re looking for the trappings of the last one.\n\nThe last counterculture was loud, visual, chaotic. It showed up on the news. You could see it coming.\n\nThis one is quiet. Polite. Orderly. It looks like someone repairing a dishwasher and growing tomatoes and choosing quality over quantity. It doesn't march. It doesn't protest. It builds. And it is invisible to every instrument you have, because your instruments were designed to detect signal, and this counterculture's defining move is _the absence of signal_.\n\n## The rebels are out there.\n\nThey are ahead of you. They are already living by their principles. And they are not waiting for your marketing campaign. They are not waiting for your sustainability report.\n\nThey are waiting for you to _join them_.\n\nThe polarity has flipped. The institutions bring chaos. The counterculture responds with order — in the form of craft, durability, sovereignty, and care.\n\nThey are building a life that doesn't depend on systems that have stopped caring.\n\nThat is the counterculture of this moment. It is where the energy is. It is where the iconic brands of the next era will come from — the ones with the sense to cross over.\n\nThe only question is whether you can see it.\n\nAnd if you can — whether you have the courage to cross.\n\n> _Are you a punk?_\n\n* * *\n\nThis piece sits at a confluence point in the _On the Bubble_ series. If you have been reading along, you may recognize threads from earlier essays now woven into a single argument:\n\n_Leadership in the Time of Enshittification_ introduced institutional entropy and the space between chaos and manufactured order. This essay flips that framework outward — from diagnosis to portrait.\n\n_The Supply Mirage_ argued that the circular economy plan was always supply-side, and that it failed. This essay asks: if supply-side transformation cannot generate circularity, what does the demand side look like? The conscious non-consumer is one answer.\n\n_Empathy Is a Strategic Capacity_ identified empathy as the capability most needed for imaginative, disruptive innovation. This essay shows why: without it, you cannot perceive a counterculture that communicates through absence rather than signal.\n\n_Dunkirk Spirit and Circular Transformation_ developed the Little Ships metaphor at length. Here it serves as illustration, not argument. The full treatment lives in that earlier essay.\n\n_Maintenance Is a First Principle_ described what today's punks actually _do_ — the practices of care, repair, and stewardship. If \"Are You a Punk?\" is the cultural frame, Stewart Brand's\"On Maintenance\" is the field guide.\n\n_Transformative Ends, Incremental Means?_ covered Zeno's Paradox — the asymptotic failure of incremental supply-side improvement — at length. That structural impossibility is the reason the counterculture exists: they can see the paradox playing out, even if they wouldn't use that language.\n\nAnd looking ahead: once a brand crosses over, the next question is: what does it look like on the other side? What does it feel like to build something the quiet ones would choose?\n\nThat is where we are going.\n\n* * *\n\n_On the Bubble is a_ Circudyne Letter _series taking stock of the macro transition to circularity. Subscribe to follow the full series._\n\n* * *\n\n### This post is for subscribers only\n\nBecome a member to get access to all content\n\nSubscribe now",
  "title": "Are You a Punk?",
  "updatedAt": "2026-03-02T13:03:09.364Z"
}