{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreictvufqtpq37ahh4zq5prggffpkttrwoempbdvz3d3qz243ff2g4a",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:mz5fxkt6wuzoahfjbkojob7n/app.bsky.feed.post/3mlmizlqzeiv2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreifozjrmivcmg3ulcvqefxbkb67bfm2gvmq7wifyhecvgl2khoivtq"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/webp",
    "size": 26040
  },
  "path": "/2026/05/11/three-months-in-epas-endangerment-finding-repeal-has-quietly-become-a-legal-fight-not-a-scientific-one/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-11T21:00:00.000Z",
  "site": "https://wattsupwiththat.com",
  "tags": [
    "Climate Lawsuits",
    "EPA",
    "Premium Content",
    "Endangerment Finding Recession",
    "Massachusetts v. EPA",
    "Suncor Energy Inc. v. Boulder",
    "Three Months In: EPA’s Endangerment Finding Repeal Has Quietly Become a Legal Fight, not a Scientific One",
    "Watts Up With That?"
  ],
  "textContent": "For all the talk of finally relitigating the underlying climate science, the EPA's final rule does almost none of that. It does not argue that greenhouse gases fail to qualify as pollutants. It does not litigate model sensitivities, the surface temperature record, attribution methodology, or any of the empirical questions that WUWT contributors and others have spent close to two decades documenting. The science case is, formally, not the basis of the rule.\n\nThe post Three Months In: EPA’s Endangerment Finding Repeal Has Quietly Become a Legal Fight, not a Scientific One appeared first on Watts Up With That?.",
  "title": "Three Months In: EPA’s Endangerment Finding Repeal Has Quietly Become a Legal Fight, not a Scientific One"
}