{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiadxj6y3cev6iphttu2i75oeqse5x4twaoxc6v376t4qzysmrpgva",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:mz5fxkt6wuzoahfjbkojob7n/app.bsky.feed.post/3mkzzgptyfus2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreics4tuvwsinqmquu72wqqku2irbjwcbs6vnxvxnden54v3ymvmpui"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/webp",
    "size": 64638
  },
  "path": "/2026/05/04/amicus-brief-of-naomi-oreskes-er-expert-report-redux-5-the-conservation-law-foundation-v-shell-version/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-05-04T13:00:00.000Z",
  "site": "https://wattsupwiththat.com",
  "tags": [
    "Climate Lawsuits",
    "Naomi Oreskes",
    "Amicus Brief of Naomi Oreskes … er, “Expert Report” Redux 5: the Conservation Law Foundation v Shell version",
    "Watts Up With That?"
  ],
  "textContent": "The legacy new media reporters never once questioned the collective accusation sources behind the “crooked skeptic climate scientists” accusation. This rock-bottom journalism malfeasance problem is unsustainable. The crash of the entire situation could be epic, with worldwide repercussions.\n\nThe post Amicus Brief of Naomi Oreskes … er, “Expert Report” Redux 5: the Conservation Law Foundation v Shell version appeared first on Watts Up With That?.",
  "title": "Amicus Brief of Naomi Oreskes … er, “Expert Report” Redux 5: the Conservation Law Foundation v Shell version"
}