{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreicktrwwdmuzxfdkrvl6fnjruxi5wbdkt5o4vwijpalmgspcpntlte",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:mz5fxkt6wuzoahfjbkojob7n/app.bsky.feed.post/3mjy3kjgyw452"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreigywew7pikifc4losfjzpu35zte2okqskt3cgfpknev5qkm6oecp4"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/webp",
    "size": 49964
  },
  "path": "/2026/04/20/wrong-the-independent-the-atlantic-current-isnt-on-the-brink-of-collapse/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-21T01:00:00.000Z",
  "site": "https://wattsupwiththat.com",
  "tags": [
    "AMO",
    "Bad science journalism",
    "Tipping Points",
    "Alarmism",
    "AMCOC",
    "The Independent",
    "Wrong, The Independent, the Atlantic Current Isn’t on the Brink of Collapse",
    "Watts Up With That?"
  ],
  "textContent": "The Independent declaring a looming catastrophe based on one modeling study doesn’t represent balanced, informed science reporting. Rather, it is acting as a promoter for an alarming, unlikely climate narrative, which may attract readers but simultaneously does a disservice to them and sound science itself.\n\nThe post Wrong, The Independent, the Atlantic Current Isn’t on the Brink of Collapse appeared first on Watts Up With That?.",
  "title": "Wrong, The Independent, the Atlantic Current Isn’t on the Brink of Collapse"
}