{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiev23nay5gfp7mzr4ihxi6lrppdgbxhv4vg347qzfbrr4mlbkueny",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:mz5fxkt6wuzoahfjbkojob7n/app.bsky.feed.post/3mjr55vusnib2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreicnsxj4rzk4b7hg3oiezxg3kxqphlwmln3okaiwji5fbln26r2beu"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/webp",
    "size": 93304
  },
  "path": "/2026/04/17/breaking-major-under-the-radar-scotus-decision-on-climate-lawfare/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-04-17T18:25:00.000Z",
  "site": "https://wattsupwiththat.com",
  "tags": [
    "Climate Lawsuits",
    "Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish",
    "SCOTUS",
    "Breaking: Major Under-the-Radar SCOTUS Decision on Climate Lawfare",
    "Watts Up With That?"
  ],
  "textContent": "There are Supreme Court decisions that arrive with fanfare, and then there are those that quietly rearrange the legal landscape in ways that only become obvious after the dust settles. Today's decision in Chevron USA Inc. v. Plaquemines Parish belongs firmly in the latter category. It is not packaged as a climate case. It does not speak in the language of emissions targets or environmental urgency. Yet it strikes directly at the legal machinery that has been driving a large portion of modern climate litigation.\n\nThe post Breaking: Major Under-the-Radar SCOTUS Decision on Climate Lawfare appeared first on Watts Up With That?.",
  "title": "Breaking: Major Under-the-Radar SCOTUS Decision on Climate Lawfare"
}