{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreiadehkxcum6od27kd6lv5ze2p2vnph63oltikhjmbwhtfaqqa4mra",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:mz5fxkt6wuzoahfjbkojob7n/app.bsky.feed.post/3mhhphseyzba2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreieonzexl5ooqxz7word2let42etpo34hc27ixvqem6c5ajqu5aewm"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 42108
  },
  "path": "/2026/03/19/wrong-daily-mail-antarcticas-thwaites-glacier-isnt-on-the-road-to-collapse-by-2067/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-03-20T01:00:00.000Z",
  "site": "https://wattsupwiththat.com",
  "tags": [
    "Antarctic Ice Mass",
    "Bad science journalism",
    "Glaciers",
    "Sea level",
    "Daily Mail",
    "Thwaites Glacier"
  ],
  "textContent": "There is a pattern here. The Daily Mail has long demonstrated a preference for dramatic, attention-grabbing headlines that far oversell the actual story. Climate Realism has debunked its false, hyperbolic disaster scenario claims dozens of times. “Doomsday Glacier collapse by 2067” fits that formula perfectly — a bold date, a catastrophic label, and minimal context. That may drive clicks, but it does not accurately reflect the measured data or the scientific uncertainty involved.",
  "title": "Wrong, Daily Mail, Antarctica’s Thwaites Glacier Isn’t on the Road to Collapse by 2067"
}