{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreibt5vf57ps4azx4plbgbfskbcgooge7jeqdpwo3pbfig5srzkopse",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:mz5fxkt6wuzoahfjbkojob7n/app.bsky.feed.post/3mfq72t5bjds2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreihh5wwb2zfpa7zanyqixazkmwmsgttnwj5yhpkv2zxmsim4uz7bry"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 96289
  },
  "path": "/2026/02/25/the-global-tipping-points-report-2025-part-7-climate-as-legal-imperative-and-the-judicialization-of-policy/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-02-26T02:00:00.000Z",
  "site": "https://wattsupwiththat.com",
  "tags": [
    "Commentary",
    "Premium Content",
    "Tipping Points",
    "Judicialization of Policy",
    "tipping points"
  ],
  "textContent": "This installment addresses one of the most consequential shifts embedded in the report: the transformation of climate policy from a legislative choice into a legal obligation. Once climate stability is framed as a justiciable right, the arena of decision-making shifts from parliaments and voters to courts and legal doctrine.",
  "title": "The Global Tipping Points Report 2025 Part 7: Climate as Legal Imperative and the Judicialization of Policy"
}