{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreigssh5ts3p423pax6yvn5m7mwccimrs74yeo7qdhvcdzy22ibmla4",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:mz5fxkt6wuzoahfjbkojob7n/app.bsky.feed.post/3mf5pxk2bnau2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreiabouwh4fohdmaz3gwgbedtcxqswedttzc2qplnpdnxkolu4vn3ba"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 96168
  },
  "path": "/2026/02/18/the-global-tipping-points-report-2025-part-2-governance-architecture-and-technocratic-expansion/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-02-18T18:00:00.000Z",
  "site": "https://wattsupwiththat.com",
  "tags": [
    "Commentary",
    "Premium Content",
    "Tipping Points",
    "Global Tipping Points Report"
  ],
  "textContent": "This is Part II of a multipart, systematic refutation of the University of Exeter’s Global Tipping Points Report 2025. In Part I, the focus was the report’s rhetorical architecture: the language of catastrophe, the asserted imminence of tipping thresholds, and the tension between executive certainty and the substantial uncertainties acknowledged in the underlying literature . The central question was whether the urgency narrative accurately reflects the probabilistic nature of tipping science.",
  "title": "The Global Tipping Points Report 2025 Part 2: Governance Architecture and Technocratic Expansion"
}