{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreids23yed3ompfmzevuqh664e6nb7kzlhnh6pz23kpfk3gz6mkcbta",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:mg5ozsljpp6t5b4lvwys4t72/app.bsky.feed.post/3mdgyaeiz2av2"
  },
  "coverImage": {
    "$type": "blob",
    "ref": {
      "$link": "bafkreibtvvjfj3saeex5lqh3bsyjxg2rp75gdkfhrnnhxi5lcstlxqhpqe"
    },
    "mimeType": "image/jpeg",
    "size": 63951
  },
  "description": "The current review may be more consequential than past cycles.",
  "path": "/fcc-weighs-comments-in-latest-broadcast-ownership-review/",
  "publishedAt": "2026-01-28T00:09:01.000Z",
  "site": "https://broadbandbreakfast.com",
  "tags": [
    "July decision in",
    "Section 202(h)",
    "Subscribe now"
  ],
  "textContent": "WASHINGTON, Jan. 27, 2026 – As the Federal Communications Commission reviews reply comments in its latest quadrennial broadcast ownership proceeding, legal experts say this cycle stands out from past reviews.\n\n**Danielle Burt** , a partner at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius, said the review is unfolding against the backdrop of multiple media ownership proceedings at the FCC, and the Eighth Circuit’s July decision in _Zimmer Radio v. FCC_ , which ended the FCC’s long-standing “top-four” rule and affirmed Section 202(h) of the 1996 Telecom Act a deregulatory mandate.\n\nBurt said the current review could present an opening for the FCC to reconsider its broadcast ownership rules more broadly.\n\n### This post is for subscribers only\n\nBecome a member to get access to all content\n\nSubscribe now",
  "title": "FCC Weighs Comments in Latest Broadcast Ownership Review",
  "updatedAt": "2026-05-22T09:55:42.614Z"
}