{
  "$type": "site.standard.document",
  "bskyPostRef": {
    "cid": "bafyreic7v7k6kut5ngguachcy64n4zg24oxagtoqurprmweb7pbhsv3izm",
    "uri": "at://did:plc:lk3jfj3zq4k4wxnk474axylu/app.bsky.feed.post/3moxkgz2lre22"
  },
  "path": "/t/codex-cyber-abuse-false-positive-defensive-security-on-own-servers-c-nyax3voodjhc/1384485#post_1",
  "publishedAt": "2026-06-23T13:42:14.000Z",
  "site": "https://community.openai.com",
  "textContent": "Hello ，\n\nMy ChatGPT Pro account was deactivated on June 21, 2026 for alleged “Cyber Abuse” in Codex. I submitted an appeal but received a final rejection. I am requesting a reappeal with additional context.\n\nUser ID: user-R9MWu2VYlo3vwj36b2ogV3ri\n\n**New context for reappeal:**\nWe are a development team building our own commercial APP. Our Codex usage included **Static and Dynamic Testing** for OUR OWN system — vulnerability scanning and security on app and its backend we own and operate.\n\nAuditing code quality for both frontend and backend (vibecoded), and performing dynamic/static testing to ensure the service is reliable and bug-free — this is literally just normal app development, right?\n\nI believe the automated classifier misinterpreted these defensive security operations as offensive “Cyber Abuse.” This was purely defensive work to protect our own product and users — standard security industry practice.\n\nI have already submitted a reappeal via the official form. Could a staff member please manually review this case? This account is critical to my work.\n\nThank you.",
  "title": "Codex \"Cyber Abuse\" False Positive — Defensive Security on Own Servers[C-NyAx3VoodJhc]"
}